CELICA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, it is crucial for potential homebuyers to carefully assess builders before making significant investment decisions. This blog post focuses on CELICA PROPERTIES Private Limited, a builder operating in West Bengal, with a mixed track record of complaints and legal outcomes. Thoroughly examining CELICA PROPERTIES allows potential buyers to make informed decisions about their future homes.

Overview of CELICA PROPERTIES Private Limited

CELICA PROPERTIES Private Limited is a builder situated in West Bengal. With limited public information available regarding its past projects and customer satisfaction, the factual implications of its customer service and project delivery timelines become paramount. Crucially, CELICA PROPERTIES has encountered 1 complaint on public record, indicating that they may not have an extensive history of consumer grievances. However, their legal case results raise several flags worth noting.

Legal Cases Involving CELICA PROPERTIES

The builder has faced one legal case, resulting in a loss. Here are the details:

• Case: The appellant, presumably a buyer, argued that project delays stemmed from multiple external factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, labor shortages, and supply chain disruptions. Conversely, CELICA PROPERTIES contended that these delays were outside its control and attributed the need for an extension to external circumstances.
• Verdict: The court allowed an extension of 12 months (for the project completion date to now be from 01.10.2023 to 30.09.2024), indicating that despite the pandemic's impact, there were undeniable delays in the project’s progress.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

• Common Factors in Cases Lost: The builder's case loss highlights a clear pattern where external circumstances clash with performance expectations, resulting in dissatisfaction among purchasers. The pandemic, labor shortages, and supply chain issues were cited as contributing factors, but ultimately the court recognized the delays and did not favor the builder's claims.
• Common Factors in Cases Won: Notably, CELICA PROPERTIES has not won any cases, suggesting that either all complaints have lacked sufficient legal basis or the company has not effectively demonstrated the merits in its defenses.

Assessment of CELICA PROPERTIES

Given the data at hand, CELICA PROPERTIES Private Limited presents a somewhat concerning picture for potential buyers. The lack of successful case histories combined with the single complaint adds a layer of caution for homebuyers. The acknowledgment of delays and the necessity of extensions signal deficiencies in project management that might affect future homeowners.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder’s track record and seek out reviews from previous customers. Investigating the status of current projects may yield insights into their operational efficiency.
2. Legal Precautions: Always understand the builder's legal standing. Given the outcomes of legal disputes, it might be wise to consult legal professionals prior to purchasing property.
3. Get Everything in Writing: Ensure that all promises made by the builder regarding timelines, materials, and other factors are documented. This can protect your interests and provide recourse if issues arise.
4. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, tour completed projects to assess the quality of work and ensure that it meets your expectations.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Review builder credentials and know their history.
• Compare multiple builders and their offerings.
• Look for builders with strong reputations and positive reviews.
• Ensure clarity about project timelines and penalties for delays.
• Consider financial health; a builder under financial strain may struggle to complete projects on time.

Conclusion

CELICA PROPERTIES Private Limited operates in a complex and challenging market. Their current standing suggests potential buyers should approach with caution. Thorough research, engagement with previous clients, and legal diligence are paramount when navigating their projects. By following the outlined tips, you can safeguard your investment and ensure a satisfactory home buying experience.

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder CELICA PROPERTIES Private Limited, which it lost, reveals several recurring themes primarily revolving around project completion delays and contestation of penalties.

Delayed Possession Claims

A common theme is the builder's contestation of claims related to delays in possession. In these cases, the builder often attributed delays to mitigating factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic and supply chain disruptions. However, the courts assessed these claims against the responsibilities expected from a builder and penalized instances of delayed handover.

Disputes Over Project Completion Extensions

This theme highlights cases where the builder sought extensions for project completion times. For instance, in one case, the builder claimed that external factors hindered progress. The courts, however, granted relief to the other party, reiterating the importance of timely project completion and the need for adherence to the original completion dates.

Contestation of Penalties for Delays

The builder also frequently contested penalties imposed due to project delays. These cases often revolved around arguments challenging the legitimacy of the penalties and the conditions that triggered them. The courts usually sided with the respondents, indicating that delays could not be justified by external factors alone.

Non-Compliance with Contractual Obligations

Another area of focus for the builder's legal battles stemmed from alleged non-compliance with contractual obligations. It was evident that there were significant gaps in the builder’s adherence to agreed terms, which led to unfavorable rulings against them.

The reasons the builder commonly brought cases to court include a perceived unjust imposition of penalties, disputes regarding project delays influenced by external circumstances, and disagreements over contractual obligations. A recurrent pattern is the builder's attempt to shift blame onto external factors rather than addressing potential shortcomings in project management or commitments.

The common reasons for the builder losing these cases include insufficient evidence to substantiate claims of force majeure, non-compliance with established timelines and contractual stipulations, and a lack of understanding of legal requirements and obligations. The courts emphasized that it is the builder's responsibility to ensure project timelines are met and upheld, regardless of potential external disruptions.

Overall, these cases serve as a cautionary tale for both builders and buyers in the real estate market, emphasizing the need for transparency, compliance, and robust project management to avoid disputes and maintain timely deliveries.