CHAUHANS PARK VIEW PHASE-4

Overview of Chauhans Park View Phase-4

Chauhans Park View Phase-4 is a residential project located in Chhattisgarh. As a builder, it has been marked by a notable challenge involving legal complaints, which potential buyers should be aware of.

Legal History and Complaints

The builder has recorded a total of 1 complaint lodged against it, resulting in 0 cases won and 1 case lost. The legal dispute primarily revolved around the Compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).

Case Summary

In the specific case that was filed against Chauhans Park View Phase-4, the CG RERA administration claimed that the promoter non-complied with the RERA Act. In response, the promoter asserted that they were indeed compliant with the existing regulations. Ultimately, the case was closed with a warning to the builder to adhere to RERA provisions moving forward. This outcome reflects a level of regulatory scrutiny faced by the builder, which should be considered by potential buyers.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

The key factor in the case lost by Chauhans Park View Phase-4 stems from an alleged failure to comply with the RERA Act. This suggests that compliance with regulatory standards and laws is critically important for this builder. The warning issued indicates that the builder's practices may have required adjustments to align more closely with regulatory expectations.

Cases Won

Although the builder has not won any cases, there was a case that was ultimately resolved with a warning rather than outright dismissal of their claims. This could indicate a light mitigation for the builder, suggesting that while there was an issue, it might not have been severe enough for the regulator to enforce harsher penalties.

Conclusion: Assessing Chauhans Park View Phase-4

Given these circumstances, potential buyers should approach Chauhans Park View Phase-4 with caution. The single complaint and the legal challenges associated with it raise valid concerns about the builder's adherence to regulatory standards, which is crucial in the real estate market.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder’s past projects and any complaints that have been lodged against them.
• Request Documentation: Ensure that the builder provides the necessary documents affirming compliance with RERA regulations.
• Consult Legal Experts: Talk to real estate professionals or legal advisors who can guide you through the complexities of buying property in compliance with existing laws.
• Look for Transparency: A builder that is upfront about their legal standings is generally more trustworthy.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Check Reviews: Look for reviews and feedback from previous buyers, as this can provide insights into the builder’s reliability.
• Evaluate Projects: Assess the quality of the builder's completed projects before making a decision.
• Understand the Market: Be informed about the real estate market regulations in your area to make confident purchasing decisions.

In summary, while Chauhans Park View Phase-4 may have appealing residential offerings, the legal history prompts a prudent approach to any purchasing decisions.

Analysis of the cases filed against Chauhans Park View Phase-4 that the builder lost reveals several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder. The cases highlight two primary themes: regulatory compliance disputes and project delay and penalty claims.

In terms of regulatory compliance, the most notable case involved CG RERA claiming non-compliance with the RERA Act by the builder. The builder's defense was rooted in their assertion of compliance, yet the verdict ultimately warned the builder to adhere to the provisions outlined in the RERA Act. This case underscores a pattern where builders may face legal challenges due to insufficient adherence to regulatory standards, and it serves as a reminder to potential buyers that such issues could affect the integrity of projects.

Project delay and penalty claims did not feature prominently in the cases summarized, suggesting that the builder may not have faced significant litigation over delays or penalties imposed for late delivery of units. However, it is critical to note that regulatory non-compliance often precedes other issues, such as delays or disputes over project delivery, and thus may indirectly contribute to claims involving delays or penalties.

The common reasons for litigation in these cases primarily revolved around the builder's failure to meet regulatory requirements. The CG RERA case demonstrated a degree of leniency with a warning rather than an outright penalty, indicating that the builder was perhaps closer to compliance than not, yet the underlying issue of non-compliance prompted legal action.

In conclusion, buyers should be discerning when engaging with builders that have faced regulatory compliance disputes. Such issues may indicate a broader trend of oversight or a lack of due diligence with legal requirements. Potential buyers are advised to inquire about a builder's compliance history and any ongoing legal matters before making a purchase decision.