CHORDIA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the real estate market, the reputation and reliability of a builder can greatly impact the purchasing decision of potential homebuyers. In this blog post, we delve into the details of Chordia Buildcon Private Limited, examining their legal history, particularly focusing on the cases they have encountered, and what this means for prospective buyers.

Overview of Chordia Buildcon Private Limited

Company Background

Chordia Buildcon Private Limited is a builder operating predominantly in Rajasthan. Their performance, however, has been marked by a notable number of legal complaints, which warrants a closer look at their track record in resolving these issues.

Legal Overview

• Number of Complaints: 39
• Cases Won: 19
• Cases Lost: 20

This legal history raises both questions and considerations for future buyers.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost by Chordia Buildcon

The builder has faced a total of 20 cases where they were ruled against. The common themes arising from these cases include:

1. Non-submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs): A significant number of claims involved the failure to submit required QPRs on the RERA web portal. Many cases highlighted either the lack of timely submissions or issues related to technical problems that prevented submission.
2. Penalties and Revocations: The outcomes across these cases often involved directions from the Authority to pay penalties and deposit delay processing charges, indicating a pattern of non-compliance with RERA requirements.
3. Repeated Issues: The same allegations recurred across multiple cases, showing a systematic problem rather than isolated incidents. The builder frequently cited technical issues as reasons for these lapses, suggesting internal challenges that may need addressing.

Cases Won by Chordia Buildcon

In contrast, Chordia Buildcon was successful in 19 cases. The prevalent patterns include:

1. Evidence of Reports Submitted: In most winning cases, the builder claimed they had submitted the QPRs, countering the claims from the appellants effectively, and prompting the Authority to accept their submissions while directing the completion of pending reports.
2. Claims of Unjustified Penalties: Often, the builder successfully argued that penalties were unjustified, as they believed the submissions were made in compliance with regulations, and highlighted administrative or technical discrepancies in the process.
3. Technical Defense: Many winning cases revolved around claims that technical issues were to blame for the perceived failure to comply, indicating that some losses may have stemmed from communication gaps or administrative errors rather than deliberate lapses.

Conclusion

In summary, Chordia Buildcon Private Limited presents a mixed legal history characterized by ongoing issues primarily centered around the submission of QPRs to regulatory bodies. The builder's repeated failures in this regard may signal potential risks for buyers regarding project transparency and adherence to legal standards. However, their successful defense in a substantial number of cases shows that they can maintain compliance under the right circumstances.

Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Chordia Buildcon

1. Due Diligence: Thoroughly research the builder's reputation, focusing on feedback from past clients regarding project delivery and legal compliance.
2. Project Monitoring: Ask about the availability and accessibility of QPRs and other documentation related to your prospective purchase.
3. Seek Legal Advice: If you're considering a significant investment, consult with a legal professional familiar with real estate transactions, especially focusing on RERA compliance.

General Tips for Buying from Any Builder

1. Check Credentials: Ensure the builder is registered and complies with local regulations.
2. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit the builder's prior completed projects to gauge quality and craftsmanship.
3. Understand Financial Terms: Be clear about payment terms, timelines, and penalties associated with delays or defaults.

By arming yourself with knowledge and diligence, you can avoid pitfalls and make well-informed decisions when navigating the real estate market.

Analysis of the cases filed against Chordia Buildcon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the various disputes. The cases primarily revolve around the builder's failure to comply with regulatory requirements, particularly concerning the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) to the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) web portal.

The most common theme among the cases is the builder's failure to submit the required QPRs on time, which led to penalties and potential revocation of their registration. The builder consistently claimed that they had submitted the reports, often attributing the lack of records on the RERA portal to technical issues. However, the Authority ruled against the builder by directing them to upload the pending reports and pay applicable penalties, indicating a pattern of negligence in fulfilling their obligations.

Another significant theme is the dispute over project completion certificates. In one case, the Authority determined that the completion certificate provided by the builder was not issued by a competent authority, thus treating the project as ongoing. This highlights a troubling trend where builders may attempt to pass off incomplete projects as finished to avoid further scrutiny.

The reasons people brought cases against the builder primarily center around the builder’s non-compliance with the RERA regulations and the potential risks this poses to buyers. Common triggers for litigation include the builder's failure to provide transparency in their progress, which can indicate delays or abandonment of projects, and the builder's attempts to obscure this information by disputing the validity of the RERA's record-keeping.

The builder lost these cases predominantly due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of compliance. While they frequently cited technical issues as a cause for the missing reports, the RERA Authority appeared unconvinced, suggesting that the builder's failures might stem from a systematic lack of adherence to procedures rather than isolated incidents of technological malfunction. Furthermore, the builder's occasional reliance on completion certificates from incompetent authorities underscores a significant lapse in judgment and adherence to standards.

In conclusion, the analysis of these cases illustrates critical issues within Chordia Buildcon Private Limited's operational practices, specifically concerning compliance with RERA regulations and transparency in project management. Buyers should approach this builder with caution, weighing carefully the potential risks associated with their pattern of litigation and regulatory disputes.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following insights into the recurring disputes and legal challenges faced by Chordia Buildcon Private Limited. The cases primarily revolved around issues related to non-compliance with regulatory reporting, specifically concerning the timely submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) to the RERA web portal. This thematic categorization of cases highlights that a significant number of disputes were initiated due to alleged delayed or missing reports, leading to claims of penalties and potential revocation of registration.

The various parties involved, usually appellants or regulatory bodies, brought these cases primarily under the premise that the builder had either failed to submit the required documentation or had submitted it late. Frequently cited reasons for these claims included technical issues, disputes over whether the QPRs were actually submitted or not, and allegations that the builder was not transparent in their reporting practices.

Upon reviewing the outcomes, a notable pattern emerges indicating the rationale behind the builder's victories. In multiple instances, the opposing parties were unable to provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims—often relying on assertions without substantial backing. Additionally, many cases reflected misunderstandings regarding timelines and obligations set forth by the regulatory framework, which the builder was equipped to counter. Notably, the builder consistently adhered to the directives issued by the Authority, promptly addressing the issues by uploading pending QPRs and paying penalties where applicable, as directed by the court.

This analysis sheds light on Chordia Buildcon Private Limited's reputation within the market. The frequency of legal challenges rooted in claims of false or exaggerated accusations suggests a tendency among buyers to bring forth disputes that may not be adequately substantiated. It underscores the importance of buyer diligence, illustrating that claims in the real estate sector should be approached with caution to ensure that opinions formed about a builder are based on substantial evidence and not just hearsay.

In conclusion, potential buyers are urged to conduct thorough research and weigh claims critically. While legitimate disputes exist in the market, the ability of builders like Chordia Buildcon Private Limited to defend against unjust claims underscores the importance of informed decision-making. Buyers should prioritize reliable information over anecdotal evidence when evaluating a builder’s reputation.