CHUTANI, TERRA GROUP SUNIL KUMAR PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the realm of real estate development, potential buyers often seek reliable builders with a proven track record. One such builder to consider is Chutani, Terra Group Sunil Kumar Private Limited, operating in Rajasthan. This blog post delves into the builder's legal history, complaint record, and presents useful insights for buyers contemplating purchases from this entity.

Overview of Chutani, Terra Group Sunil Kumar Private Limited

Chutani, Terra Group Sunil Kumar Private Limited has recorded a total of 1 complaint. The builder, however, does not have any cases won under their belt but has lost 1 case in the legal domain, making it crucial for prospective buyers to scrutinize their standing and practices thoroughly.

Legal Case Insights

Summary of Legal Cases

• In the solitary legal case lodged against the builder, the complainant accused them of failing to adhere to an order dated 20.06.2018, specifically regarding non-payment of the ordered amount.
• The builder countered by claiming that the ruling was void, citing that it was issued by an authority lacking competency.
• Ultimately, the authority decreed that the builder should incur a penalty of Rs. 100/- per day for each day of default until payment was made.

Common Patterns in Cases

• Cases Lost: The single case lost by Chutani points to a failure in compliance with previous judgments. The builder did not fulfill a financial obligation as mandated by the authorities, indicating potential issues with reliability when it comes to meeting financial commitments.
• Cases Won: On the other hand, even though the builder's record includes a situation where they seem to have avoided liabilities, it nonetheless raises questions about their credibility. The argument that the order was void suggests a pattern of disputing authority rather than addressing client grievances directly.

Overall Assessment

Chutani, Terra Group Sunil Kumar Private Limited presents a mixed image based on the available legal records. With one complaint and a lost case under its belt, prospective buyers should approach with caution. The builder's history of legal disputes shows a reluctance to engage in amicable resolutions, which could signal trouble down the line.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Verify Builder's Reputation: Before making any decisions, look for additional reviews or testimonials from past clients. This insight can give a clearer picture of their reliability and quality of service.
2. Inquire About Ongoing Projects: Investigate the current projects undertaken by the builder to assess their commitment and resource allocation.
3. Understand Legal Implications: Ensure that any agreements or contracts are thoroughly reviewed by a legal expert to mitigate risks associated with potential disputes.
4. Check Compliance Records: Request information regarding how the builder has handled previous complaints and if they corrected any faults within specified timelines.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Always conduct personal research on the builder’s history and project completion timelines.
• Ensure that you have legal protections in place before entering any contract.
• Look for high-quality customer service, as this can be indicative of how the builder will handle future responsibilities and grievances.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Chutani, Terra Group Sunil Kumar Private Limited operates in Rajasthan and has a noteworthy presence, their single lost case and corresponding legal challenges should be carefully weighed by potential buyers. By exercising due diligence and following best practices when selecting any builder, buyers can better navigate the often-complex world of real estate.

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Terra Group Sunil Kumar Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around two topics: non-compliance with municipal orders and penalties for project delays.

Cases involving non-compliance with municipal orders typically arise when the builder fails to adhere to decisions made by local authorities. In the example outlined, the builder contested an order dated 20.06.2018 by claiming it was void due to being passed by an incompetent authority. However, this defense did not stand, and the builder was directed to pay a penalty for non-compliance, indicating a legal obligation to fulfill such orders.

Penalties for project delays are another recurring theme. Delays often trigger legal disputes, especially when buyers or investors are left waiting for possession of their properties. While the specific case summarized focuses on the builder's failure to comply with a payment order rather than a delay in construction, it illustrates the broader tendency for builders to face legal challenges when they do not meet contractual or regulatory requirements, including timely project completion.

The common reasons people bring cases against this builder seem to revolve around its failure to honor commitments—whether those commitments are to comply with municipal orders, complete projects on time, or make requisite payments. The builder's frequent reliance on procedural defenses, as seen in the case above, indicates a pattern of attempting to circumvent responsibilities rather than addressing grievances directly.

Ultimately, the builder's losses in these cases highlight the importance of adhering to legal frameworks and fulfilling obligations to clients and authorities. Insufficient evidence, failure to comply with rules, and misunderstandings of regulatory requirements are critical factors that contribute to the builder's legal defeats. Buyers should take these patterns into account when considering the builder's credibility and reliability in future projects.