CITY INFAVENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of real estate in Madhya Pradesh, potential homebuyers often conduct thorough research before making a significant investment. One builder that has piqued interest is City Infaventure Private Limited. With a record of complaints and legal cases, it’s essential to delve deeper into their business practices, particularly in light of their legal challenges.

Overview of Legal Cases

City Infaventure Private Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints against them, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. This raises eyebrows and leads potential buyers to question the reliability of the builder when it comes to fulfilling their contractual obligations.

Details of Complaints

1. Case 1: An applicant who had paid 82% of the amount for a flat sued the builder for failure to deliver possession despite repeated requests.
   - Builder's Claim: The builder contended that the full payment had not been made and that construction was still in progress.
   - Verdict: A settlement was reached; the applicant was given possession, and the builder was instructed to complete the outstanding work.
2. Case 2: Another applicant claimed to have paid 83% of the flat's cost but was still waiting for possession.
   - Builder's Claim: Similar to the first case, the builder stated that the remaining 17% had not been paid and noted delays in construction.
   - Verdict: The builder was directed to finish the project within a specified timeframe, with an opportunity for the applicant to pay the remaining balance in installments.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Common Factors in Lost Cases

The two cases City Infaventure lost share thematic similarities:

• Delayed Possession: In both instances, the applicants expressed dissatisfaction due to the builder's failure to deliver possession of the flats despite substantial payments.
• Payment Disputes: There appears to be a recurring issue with the remaining amount owed by the buyers, suggesting a miscommunication or disagreement regarding payment timelines.
• Settlements Encouraged by Authorities: In both situations, the builder was compelled to reach agreements, implying a lack of proactive transparency and fulfillment of contracts.

Insights from Won Cases

Interestingly, the cases that ended in the builder's favor still highlight critical elements worthy of discussion:

• Final Agreements: In both instances, the resolution came only after substantial payments had already been made by the buyers, indicating a need for intervention.
• Specific Completion Directives: The authorities imposed strict deadlines for construction completion, reflecting concerns about the builder's punctuality and reliability in delivering properties.

Conclusion

City Infaventure Private Limited's history of legal challenges raises significant red flags for potential buyers. The losses in these legal disputes indicate ongoing concerns regarding construction timelines and contractual obligations. Buyers should exercise caution and conduct comprehensive due diligence before entering into any agreements with this builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Request Transparency: Before making any commitments, ask for detailed timelines and documentation regarding project completion.
2. Understand Payment Terms: Clarify the payment structure and ensure that you are fully aware of any remaining balances.
3. Seek Legal Advice: Consulting with a legal professional can provide insights into the builder’s reputation and help you understand your rights.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Research Reviews and Complaints: Investigate customer testimonials and any complaints filed against the builder.
• Verify Licenses and Credentials: Ensure the builder is properly licensed and has a good standing in the industry.
• Assess Financial Stability: A builder's financial health can be indicative of their ability to complete projects as promised.

In summary, while City Infaventure Private Limited operates within Madhya Pradesh, their track record necessitates thorough scrutiny by potential buyers to safeguard their investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against City Infaventure Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes over Payment and Project Completion.

The cases often involved applicants claiming that they had paid a significant percentage of the amount for their flats, yet possession had not been provided despite multiple requests. The builder, in their defense, would typically counter that the remaining balance had not been paid or that construction delays were caused by various factors. This indicates a systemic issue where communication about project timelines and payment requirements may not have been clearly understood by both parties.

A common reason for litigation in these cases was the builder’s failure to provide possession of the property on time, which directly led to claims of delayed possession. Additionally, there were repeated disputes over the remaining payment and the builder's assertions that construction was ongoing or had been slowed down due to unspecified reasons. This points to an emerging pattern where the builder may have either mismanaged expectations regarding project completion timelines or failed to adequately communicate with buyers about their obligations and the construction process.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to fulfill their commitments to providing timely possession and completion of the flats. The legal outcomes suggested that the builder did not meet regulatory or contractual requirements, which further supports the idea that there were significant operational and communicational shortcomings. The agreements reached in both cases mandated the builder to complete the properties and provide possession, highlighting the legal expectation that builders must adhere to their promises and timelines.