CIVILCO ENGINEERS AND ASSOCIATES

Introduction

In the realm of real estate construction and development, the reputation of a builder is critical to potential homebuyers and investors. In this article, we delve into the background of Civilco Engineers and Associates, examining their legal history and performance to provide a comprehensive overview for prospective clients.

Builder Overview

Civilco Engineers and Associates operates primarily in the states of Goa and Maharashtra. With a total of 7 complaints against them, the builder has been involved in 7 legal cases. Out of these, they won 3 cases and lost 4. Understanding the context and details surrounding these cases is crucial for assessing their reliability as a builder.

Legal Case Details

Cases Filed by the Builder

1. Lost Case (1): The builder filed a case but lost due to failure to comply with the RERA Act, 2016, as indicated by an appeal dismissed for not …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Civilco Engineers and Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the various legal disputes. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, disputes over the nature of sale agreements, and the imposition of penalties for delays.

Many of the claims made by the complainants in these cases focus on the delayed possession of flats. For instance, there are repeated claims for interest on delayed possession, damages for the upkeep, and other related expenses. This highlights a significant pattern where the builder has faced scrutiny for failing to deliver completed units to the buyers within the stipulated timelines.

Another recurring theme is the builder's defense that the agreements signed were not for the sale of flats but rather for securing investment repayments. This indicates a fundamental communication gap or a potential misrepresentation of the agreement's purpose, leading to disputes over the very …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Civilco Engineers and Associates, where it unfortunately lost, reveals several insights worth noting. The cases can be grouped into common themes that reflect the builder's primary disputes with clients and regulatory bodies.

1. Regulatory Non-compliance: One of the recurring issues in the builder's disputes relates to non-compliance with the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). In particular, an appeal was dismissed due to the builder's failure to comply with the requirements set forth by this regulatory framework, indicating a possible lack of understanding or disregard for legal protocols governing real estate operations in the region.
2. Penalties for Project Delays: The builder has faced challenges surrounding penalties related to project delays. Cases in this category typically involve disputes over who is at fault for delays—whether they were within the builder's control or attributed …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Civilco Engineers and Associates, which it won, revealed the following information. The summaries indicate several key themes reflecting the nature of disputes in which the builder found itself involved.

1. Compliance with Legal Provisions: Several cases involved the builder seeking compliance with regulatory provisions. For instance, one notable case featured the builder seeking an extension to comply with a legal Proviso, ultimately indicating the proactive measures they took to align with legal expectations.
2. Regulatory Disputes: The builder faced off against orders issued by regulatory bodies, as seen in a case against the Goa RERA order. This highlights the builder's attempts to navigate through the regulatory landscape, sometimes in disagreement with regulatory determinations.
3. Challenges Against Penalties: The builder frequently contested penalties, seeking to either delay or dismiss financial penalties imposed by authorities. This shows an underlying …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Civilco Engineers and Associates, which the builder won, revealed the following information:

The disputes primarily revolve around regulatory non-compliance, particularly related to the registration of ongoing projects. In this specific case, the complainant alleged that Civilco failed to register seven ongoing projects with the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), which is a violation of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. However, the builder countered that five of these projects had received completion certificates prior to the cutoff date for registration and thus were exempt from such requirements. This case falls under the themes of 'Regulatory Non-compliance' and 'Project Completion Certificates'.

These cases are often brought to court by buyers or regulatory bodies contesting penalties, asserting claims of project delays, or disputing the classification of projects—specifically whether they are subject to certain rules or not. In the examined case, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis