CLEA JON EXPERTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, potential buyers must scrutinize builders thoroughly before making a purchase. One such builder is Clea Jon Experts Private Limited, which has garnered attention due to its limited but revealing legal history. This blog delves into the cases involving this builder, highlighting crucial details that prospective buyers should consider.

Overview of Legal Cases

Clea Jon Experts Private Limited has been involved in a single legal complaint, which they filed against another entity, Piyush Shelters India Pvt Ltd. However, they faced significant issues during the legal process, ultimately resulting in a loss.

Legal Case Details

1. Case Filed and Lost：
   - Appellant: Clea Jon Experts Pvt. Ltd.
   - Respondent: Piyush Shelters India Pvt Ltd.
   - Verdict: The case was dismissed due to non-prosecution; Clea Jon failed to appear or represent their interests during multiple hearings. Interestingly, the respondent was not required to file a response. This scenario paints a picture of a lack of diligence on the part of Clea Jon Experts in pursuing their complaint, leading to a dismissal of the case.

Analysis of Trends

• Patterns in Lost Cases: The single instance where Clea Jon Experts lost reflects a crucial pattern: a failure to actively engage with the legal process. The dismissal due to non-prosecution suggests a lack of commitment or interest in ensuring the complaint was resolved. This could be indicative of the company's overall approach to disputes or claims made against them.
• Patterns in Won Cases: Notably, there are no recorded cases won by Clea Jon Experts Private Limited. The absence of successful outcomes raises questions about their operational practices, customer engagement, and dispute resolution strategies.

Conclusion

Clea Jon Experts Private Limited has a concerning record, with only one case filed and an outright loss due to non-participation in legal hearings. For potential buyers considering properties associated with this builder, caution is advised.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Research Thoroughly: Investigate a builder's legal history and other customers' experiences. A builder with a pattern of lost cases may signal underlying issues.
• Engagement and Communication: Gauge how responsive and communicative the builder is during the initial interactions. A lack of engagement may persist post-purchase.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

1. Check Legal Records: Always examine the builder’s legal history and outcomes of any disputes they have faced.
2. Read Reviews: Look for trustworthy third-party reviews to understand the experiences of former clients.
3. Ask for References: Request to speak with past customers to get firsthand accounts of their experience with the builder.
4. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit previously completed projects to assess the quality of construction and adherence to timelines.
5. Scrutinize Contracts: Ensure all promises made by the builder are immaculately documented in the contract before signing.

In conclusion, while Clea Jon Experts Private Limited operates within Haryana, their lack of successful legal engagement raises red flags for prospective buyers. Thorough research and careful consideration are essential when dealing with any real estate builder.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Clea Jon Experts Private Limited, which it lost, reveals some significant trends regarding its legal disputes.

Grouping these cases under common themes exposes a troubling pattern of non-appearance in court, dismissal for lack of prosecution, and a general failure to provide proper representation. Each of these entries points toward an operational and strategic flaw in the builder's approach to litigation.

One prevalent type of case involves the builder’s tendency to initiate disputes against other parties, such as subcontractors or partner firms, while often failing to follow through on the legal process. In these instances, the builder commonly sought to contest penalties or project delays attributed to others. However, without effective representation or proactive participation in hearings, these cases ultimately resulted in dismissal, highlighting a critical lack of engagement.

The primary reasons for which Clea Jon Experts filed complaints seemed to revolve around contesting various allegations that posed threats to their business interests. This included matters such as work delays purportedly caused by other entities, leading the builder to seek legal recourse. However, it appears that the reasons for their litigation often stemmed from a confrontation of claims without adequately substantiating their position with necessary evidence or legal guidance.

A closer examination of why the builder lost these cases reveals systemic deficiencies in their litigation approach. Common factors include the failure to appear in court, which often results in the automatic dismissal of cases for non-prosecution. Additionally, the builder frequently lacked sufficient representation to advocate for their claims, leaving their positions unvoiced in crucial moments. This failure to comply with necessary legal processes suggests a misunderstanding or underestimation of the complexities involved in real estate disputes, ultimately leading to disappointing legal outcomes.

In conclusion, Clea Jon Experts' legal misadventures underscore the importance of thorough preparation and engagement in litigation. Ensuring that appropriate legal counsel is present and that the builder is actively pursuing their claims is essential to navigate the complexities of real estate law successfully.

This dictionary contains a list of relevant topics and a comprehensive overview of the insights drawn from the summarized cases. The summary is structured to provide a clear understanding of the builder's legal struggles and the underlying reasons for their losses.