CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive world of construction and property development, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth home-buying experience. In this blog post, we will take a detailed look at CMD Buildtech Private Limited, a builder operating in Haryana. We will explore their legal track record, analyze the patterns in their cases, and offer insights for potential buyers.
CMD Buildtech Private Limited has garnered notable attention, primarily revolving around their legal disputes. With three registered complaints against them and a record of three lost cases, this builder presents a mixed picture for potential buyers.
Though the details of the claims made against CMD Buildtech were not explicitly provided, we can glean some insights from the outcomes of these cases. Here's a summary of the outcomes:
Given the available data, CMD Buildtech has lost all three of its cases. While specific details about the complaints were not provided, a key observation is the commonality among the outcomes of these cases. They indicate that while the complaints may not have been favorably resolved in a legal sense, there appeared to be a willingness to settle disputes amicably, which could reflect on the builder's approach to conflict resolution. However, consistently losing cases raises concerns about their overall reliability and credibility in fulfilling contractual obligations.
Interestingly, CMD Buildtech has no won cases, which can be a significant red flag for potential buyers. While the cases were either settled or disposed of, it highlights a lack of favorable outcomes in more formal legal proceedings. This could indicate potential issues with their projects, customer satisfaction, or a robust defense strategy in legal contexts.
Based on the available data, CMD Buildtech Private Limited presents a concerning picture for potential buyers. The consistent losses in legal cases hint at challenges that might not only affect their reputation but could also impact the quality of service and customer satisfaction.
In summary, while CMD Buildtech Private Limited operates within the competitive space of Haryana, their legal troubles warrant cautious consideration from potential home buyers. It is essential to prioritize due diligence and to engage with builders who demonstrate trustworthiness and reliability.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against CMD Buildtech Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised. The cases highlight ongoing issues that can be categorized into three main topics: Settlement Cases, Costs and Penalties, and Mutual Settlements.
The first type of cases involves settlements where the complaints were withdrawn due to an amicable agreement between the parties. This indicates that some disputes may have stemmed from misunderstandings or unrealistic expectations that were resolved through negotiation, highlighting the importance of effective communication in real estate transactions.
The second category encompasses cases where costs were imposed on the builder, demonstrating a pattern where the builder was often on the receiving end of financial penalties. This suggests that CMD Buildtech may have faced challenges related to adherence to timelines or regulatory compliance, as penalties for delays or non-compliance are common in the construction industry.
Mutual Settlements form the third theme, where the builder and the complainants reached a mutually acceptable agreement. In these cases, the builder was directed to pay costs to both the authority and the complainant, along with publication charges. This illustrates a scenario where the builder may have had sufficient grounds for defense but chose to settle, possibly to avoid the escalating costs of litigation.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: the builder’s litigation often revolved around financial disputes, project delays, and the ramifications thereof. Common triggers for these cases include the builder's failure to meet project timelines, disagreements over costs incurred, and regulatory non-compliance. The frequent imposition of costs suggests that the builder may have lacked sufficient evidence to defend against claims of delays or non-compliance, leading to a series of legal defeats.
In conclusion, the cases against CMD Buildtech indicate a need for potential buyers to exercise caution. Buyers should thoroughly investigate the builder’s track record, particularly concerning project completion timelines and regulatory adherence. Understanding these factors can help make informed decisions in the real estate market.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!