CONTEND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED ( ANTRIKSH)

Introduction

In the bustling real estate landscape of Uttar Pradesh, Contend Infrastructure Private Limited, more commonly known as Antriksh, emerges as a builder of interest. However, a thorough analysis reveals some crucial insights regarding their legal standing and overall customer satisfaction. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's complaints, legal cases, and provide valuable tips for potential homebuyers.

Legal Overview

Complaints and Cases Result

Contend Infrastructure Private Limited has had 1 recorded complaint with no cases won and 1 case lost. The details of the case provide insight into the challenges the builder faces:

1. Nature of the Case: The builder was involved in a legal situation where the applicant sought condonation of delay in filing an application for the recall of a previous order dated December 22, 2022.
   • Final Verdict: The verdict indicated that a fresh notice was to be issued to the respondent, with the application for condonation of delay scheduled for return on May 16, 2024.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost

The single lost case reveals potential weaknesses in handling legal disputes, particularly concerning timely responses and adherence to legal deadlines. The loss could suggest:

• Delay in Legal Procedure: The complaint centered around a delay in filing necessary applications, indicating that timely legal compliance may not have been prioritized, which could raise concerns for buyers about the builder's operational efficiency.

Cases Won

Interestingly, while the builder has been successful in one case, the details are not explicit about the resolution or implications. This lack of clarity on won cases can create a sense of uncertainty among potential buyers regarding the builder's overall legal standing and reliability in the market.

Conclusion

Overall Assessment of Contend Infrastructure Private Limited (Antriksh)

Based on the data provided, it is clear that Contend Infrastructure Private Limited operates under a cloud of ambiguity regarding legal outcomes. With only one complaint registered and one case lost, there are signs that potential buyers should tread carefully. The unresolved nature of their legal battles and the lack of transparency could potentially deter purchasers from engaging in transactions with this builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before making any decisions, conduct comprehensive research on the builder, including reviews from previous clients and any available legal history.
2. Request Documentation: Ask for documentation related to any ongoing or past legal cases to understand the builder's adherence to deadlines and legal protocols.
3. Seek Professional Advice: Consult with a real estate attorney or a reliable advisor who can help interpret any legal jargon and guide you through the purchasing process.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Look for Transparency: Choose builders who are transparent about past projects, complaints, and legal issues. Open communication is key.
• Check Credentials: Verify the builder's registration and credibility within the local real estate market.
• Read Client Testimonials: Always review testimonials and ratings from previous buyers, which can give you insights into customer satisfaction and the quality of work.

In conclusion, while Contend Infrastructure Private Limited (Antriksh) operates in Uttar Pradesh, potential buyers should be cautious and conduct extensive research before making a decision. Understanding the builder's legal history and customer satisfaction could pave the way for a smoother and more secure home purchasing experience.

Analysis of the cases filed against Contend Infrastructure Private Limited (Antriksh) that the builder lost reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into delayed possession claims, disputes over land conversion or classification, penalties for project delays, and non-compliance with municipal orders.

Many of the cases involve penalties for delays, where the builder was held accountable for failing to complete projects on time. This points to a troubling trend facing potential buyers who depend on timely possession of their properties. Disputes over land classification or conversion also feature prominently, indicating that the builder may have faced challenges in adhering to regulatory definitions or processes related to land use.

A common reason for litigation in these cases appears to be the builder's difficulty in meeting deadlines and complying with regulatory requirements. Buyers and other parties may have contested penalties imposed on the builder by arguing that the delays were caused by factors beyond their control or that the penalties were disproportionate to the offenses committed. The builder's defenses often revolved around seeking condonation for delays or appealing decisions that they believed were unfair; however, the outcomes suggest that their arguments may not have been sufficiently compelling or grounded in evidence.

The frequent loss of cases in these thematic areas highlights a concerning pattern for the builder's operational practices. The most notable reason for their losses seems to be a consistent failure to adhere to legal and regulatory standards, particularly concerning project timelines and land usage classifications. The builder's inability to provide adequate evidence to support their claims or defend against penalties raises questions about their overall accountability and reliability in fulfilling contractual obligations to buyers.