No Logo Available

COORDINATION REALITY

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the real estate landscape, choosing the right builder is crucial for a secure and fulfilling home-buying experience. One such builder under scrutiny is Coordination Reality, known to operate within the state of Gujarat. With two recorded complaints and no cases won in their legal battles, potential buyers may find themselves wary. In this blog, we delve into the builder's conflicts with the law and offer insights for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Overview

Coordination Reality has been involved in two legal cases where the outcomes were unfavorable for them. Here’s a brief summary of these instances:

  1. The first case revolved around a violation of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, specifically concerning the absence of display of the RERA registration number in promotional materials. The authority imposed a fine of Rs. 75,000 on the builder.
  2. In the second case, the builder faced similar allegations of advertising without a registered RERA number and failing to register the project with RERA. This also resulted in a Rs. 75,000 fine.

Patterns in the Builder's Legal Challenges

Cases Lost

  • Regulatory Compliance Issues: Both lost cases revolved around violations of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. The builder failed to display the RERA registration number and did not register their project, indicating a systemic issue regarding adherence to regulatory standards.
  • Lack of Accountability: The responses from Coordination Reality suggest a tendency to evade responsibility, maintaining that any issues were unintentional and claiming acceptance of the resolutions.

Cases Won

Interestingly, Coordination Reality has not won any cases despite defending their actions in multiple legal settings. The fines confirmed in their cases highlight a pattern of disregard for mandated real estate regulations, which has serious implications for their reputation and buyer confidence.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, Coordination Reality appears to lack a solid track record in legal compliance within the real estate framework. They have faced penalties for significant violations that detract from their reliability as a builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Due Diligence: Research the builder's reputation and legal history. Be vigilant about any complaints filed against them.
  2. Verify Regulatory Compliance: Ensure that the builder has registered their projects with applicable authorities like RERA and check if they are displaying necessary documentation.
  3. Seek Professional Advice: Consult with real estate professionals or legal advisors before making any commitments.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  • Check References: Speak to previous clients and explore reviews to gauge others' experiences with the builder.
  • Look for Transparency: A reputable builder should provide clear information about their projects and processes.
  • Assess Financial Stability: A builder's financial soundness is important for the timely completion of projects. Look for evidence of completed projects and their success rates.

Final Thoughts

While Coordination Reality may present a compelling project, the history of complaints and the outcomes of their legal challenges underscore the importance of performing thorough checks before proceeding with a purchase. Consider your options carefully and prioritize builders with a clean track record to ensure a smooth and satisfactory real estate transaction.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
RERA Compliance Violations Failure to Display Registration Information

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Coordination Reality, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two key themes: RERA compliance violations and the failure to display required registration information.

The first type of cases involved penalties for non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). The builder was fined for advertising projects without registering them with RERA and for not displaying their RERA registration number in promotional materials. This highlights a troubling pattern of disregard for regulatory requirements, which is critical in ensuring transparency and protecting the interests of prospective buyers.

The common trigger for these legal actions was the builder's failure to adhere to basic obligations under RERA. People brought cases to court primarily to contest the builder’s non-compliance, which underscored concerns about the adherence to legal standards in the real estate market. There were no instances of disputing project delays or other themes; the focus was squarely on the builder's violations of statutory requirements.

Examining the outcomes of these cases, it's evident that the builder lost due to a combination of insufficient evidence to defend their actions and a clear failure to comply with legal obligations. The builder's claims of unintentional violations did not stand, as the responsibility to understand and adhere to RERA lies with the builder.

Overall, these cases serve as a warning to potential buyers about the importance of checking RERA compliance and registration status of builders before making any investment. They also highlight the need for builders to take regulatory requirements seriously to avoid legal repercussions.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review