CREATION BUILDERS AND COLONIZERS

Introduction

When it comes to selecting a builder for your next property investment, understanding their track record can significantly influence your decision. In this post, we evaluate Creation Builders and Colonizers, a builder based in Madhya Pradesh, focusing on their complaint history and legal standing to help potential buyers make informed choices.

Overview of Creation Builders and Colonizers

Creation Builders and Colonizers operates within Madhya Pradesh and has received a total of one complaint thus far. This indicates a relatively low volume of disputes, but it’s essential to delve deeper to understand the implications of this complaint on their reputation and reliability as a builder.

Legal Case Insights

The legal case associated with Creation Builders and Colonizers reveals important details regarding their operational practices and interactions with clients:

1. Nature of Complaints: The single complaint filed against Creation Builders and Colonizers involved an applicant who claimed to have paid Rs. 30 lakhs for a property booking and sought a refund of Rs. 22 lakhs, along with interest and compensation. The builder countered that the applicant had changed their mind twice and had not approached the authority with honest intent, nor had they completed the payment for the property.
2. Outcome of the Case: Ultimately, the RERA authority ruled in favor of the applicant, ordering the builder to return the balance amount of Rs. 22 lakhs without interest within 60 days, although the authority noted the applicant's lack of clean hands.

Patterns in Legal Cases

Cases Lost:

• Common Factors: The primary factor leading to the loss of the case appears to be the builder's failure to provide sufficient evidence regarding the applicant’s alleged non-payment. This highlights the importance of documentation and clear communication in handling client transactions.

Cases Won:

• Common Factors: Although the builder has not won any cases, they successfully navigated the legal system by illustrating the applicant's inconsistent decision-making. This suggests that effective defense strategies can sometimes mitigate adverse outcomes, even if the cases result in ultimately unfavorable decisions for the builder.

Conclusion

Based on the data available, Creation Builders and Colonizers has one recorded complaint and one legal loss. While their complaint history is minimal, the loss of the legal case indicates a need for diligence in contractual agreements and customer relations management.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you are considering purchasing a property from Creation Builders and Colonizers, here are some suggestions:

• Conduct Due Diligence: Research the builder’s previous projects, customer reviews, and any legal issues they may have encountered to understand their credibility better.
• Verification of Documentation: Ensure all documents related to property transactions are correctly filled, and maintain clear communication with the builder.
• Understanding the Contract: Pay close attention to the terms within the property purchase agreement to avoid any ambiguities that could lead to disputes.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Their Reputation: Look for reviews, testimonials, and any available references from past customers.
• Evaluate Their Experience: A builder with a rich history and established projects might have more reliability.
• Assess Communication: Opt for builders who maintain transparent and open communication channels throughout the buying process.

By following the tips and insights provided here, potential buyers can navigate their property investment journey with more confidence, ensuring they choose a builder that aligns with their expectations and needs.

Analysis of the cases filed against Creation Builders and Colonizers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: refund and compensation claims, and allegations of non-payment and changed minds from the buyers.

The refund and compensation claims were highlighted by the applicant seeking a refund of Rs. 22 lakhs, along with interest and compensation, after having paid Rs. 30 lakhs for a property booking. This indicates a significant level of dissatisfaction with the builder's performance or delivery on their promises.

The allegations of non-payment and changed minds emerged as a defense strategy from the builder. The respondent claimed that the applicant had changed their mind twice and had not paid the full amount for the property. However, the RERA authority found no evidence to support the builder's claims of non-payment, leading to a verdict in favor of the applicant. This pattern suggests that builders may often resort to counter-accusations to deflect legitimate refund requests.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court in these instances include contesting refunds, disputing allegations of non-payment, and seeking compensation for what applicants perceive as breaches of contract or trust. The builder’s litigation often stems from an attempt to protect their interests and counter claims of wrongdoing, but the outcomes suggest a need for builders to adhere more closely to contractual obligations and provide transparency in transactions.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims. The RERA authority's verdict emphasized the lack of proof for the builder's contentions, which underscores the importance of maintaining proper documentation and communication in real estate dealings. Failure to do so can result in legal consequences, as seen in this case.