DAISY DEVELOPERS logo

DAISY DEVELOPERS

4.8/5 (28 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Daisy Developers: A Comprehensive Review of Legal Performance and Buyer Insights

Daisy Developers has established a presence in Rajasthan's real estate market. However, like many builders, they face legal challenges. This blog post delves into the builder's legal performance by analyzing the outcomes of complaints and cases won versus lost. We'll explore common patterns in their legal disputes, and offer insights for potential buyers considering engaging with Daisy Developers.

Legal Performance Overview

Daisy Developers has accumulated a total of 28 complaints throughout its operational tenure. Impressively, the builder has succeeded in winning 24 of these cases, indicating a high success rate of 86%. Conversely, they have also faced 4 losses, which prompts a closer examination of both the winning and losing cases.

Analysis of Lost Cases

The building's losses are notably centered around issues involving procedural discrepancies related to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Improper Notice and Process Disputes over Authority Jurisdiction

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Daisy Developers, in which they lost, reveals key insights into their disputes and the common themes under which these cases were categorized.

Regulatory Non-compliance: A significant portion of the cases revolves around the builder's failure to comply with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The recurring theme indicates a consistent struggle with adhering to the prescribed legal and procedural standards set by the Raj-RERA authority.
Improper Notice and Process: Multiple cases highlight a common issue regarding the issuance of notices and processes that were not adequately executed by the appropriate authority. The lack of proper procedural adherence led to appeals being quashed and the matters being remitted for fresh consideration.
Disputes over Authority Jurisdiction: There were frequent challenges regarding the authority's jurisdiction. The builder often contended that the notices were not issued by the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Compliance Issues Quashing of Impugned Orders Remand for Issuance of Process/Notice Lack of Contest from Respondents

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around regulatory compliance issues, notably the adequacy of the process and notice issued by the appropriate Authority of Raj-RERA, Jaipur, and whether the proceedings adhered to the framework established under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Most of these cases focused on the builder's claims regarding the legitimacy of the proceedings, arguing that notices and processes were not issued correctly. In several instances, the respondents did not contest the claims made by the builder, leading to a unified prayer to quash the impugned orders. This indicates a recurring theme where the builder often found itself in a position to challenge the procedural validity of the actions taken against it, sometimes stemming from misunderstandings or failures in adherence to established legal protocols by the opposing parties.

Common triggers for …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review