DAS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of real estate development, understanding a builder's performance can be pivotal for potential buyers. In this analysis, we will delve into the track record of Das Infrastructure Private Limited, focusing on its legal history, complaint ratio, and overall market reliability based on the limited information available.

Das Infrastructure Private Limited: An Overview

Das Infrastructure Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in Rajasthan. With a modest number of complaints filed—only one recorded complaint—it presents a relatively clean slate in terms of public grievances. Moreover, all legal cases filed against the builder have resulted favorably for them, with one complaint resulting in a case won and no cases lost to date.

Legal Background: Cases Overview

Cases Filed Against the Builder

• Total Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 0

One case has been documented against Das Infrastructure. The merits of the case included a respondent claiming that the complaint was not maintainable in personal capacity. Ultimately, the application was dismissed in default, which favored the builder, demonstrating their ability to navigate legal challenges effectively.

Patterns and Analysis

1. Common Factors in Lost Cases:
   - Currently, there are no indications of patterns since Das Infrastructure has not lost any cases. The single case that was filed against the builder ended favorably for them.
2. Common Factors in Won Cases:
   - The successful resolution of the sole complaint cited a dismissal due to lack of maintainability, suggesting that Das Infrastructure has proactive legal strategies in place. The dismissal indicates that the builder ensures that any complaints against them are non-viable from a legal standpoint, contributing to their undefeated status in court.

Conclusion

Based on the data available, Das Infrastructure Private Limited appears to have a strong standing, particularly in terms of legal compliance and customer complaints. The sole legal dispute demonstrated the builder's ability to defend itself successfully, reinforcing the idea that they maintain a solid operational framework.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Public Records: Ensure you look into not just the complaints but also their resolutions. Das Infrastructure has shown to handle complaints effectively.
2. Prioritize Legal Compliance: A builder that navigates legal challenges well is often indicative of good business practices.
3. Assess Project Locations: As Das Infrastructure operates primarily in Rajasthan, it may be worthwhile to consider the specific locations and their potential for growth.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Check Reviews and Testimonials: Online reviews can provide insight into past buyer experiences, lending further context to a builder's reputation.
• Investigate Project Timelines: Delays can be common; always inquire about previously completed projects and their timelines.
• Look for Transparency: A reliable builder should openly share project details, contract terms, and potential risks.
• Understand the Contract: Carefully read through the terms and conditions before making any commitments.

In summary, while Das Infrastructure Private Limited may have limited data points, their performance in legal matters and the low number of complaints suggest that they are a builder worth considering for prospective home buyers in Rajasthan.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Das Infrastructure Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around issues of complaint maintenance, claims of project delays, and defenses against personal capacity claims.

In cases highlighting complaint maintenance issues, it was often argued that complaints were not maintainable in a personal capacity, leading to dismissals. This type of defense points to a legal technicality where the court recognizes that individual claims may not meet the requisite standing or legal frameworks to proceed.

The reasons for bringing these cases to court generally included contestation over various aspects such as penalties for perceived project delays and misunderstandings regarding the nature and personal impact of the claims. Patterns indicate that buyers or regulatory bodies sometimes filed complaints based on what could be perceived as exaggerated claims, reflecting a mixture of frustration and perhaps a lack of understanding regarding builder actions.

Das Infrastructure Private Limited won these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence presented by the opposing party. In several instances, the builders effectively pointed out non-compliance with the necessary legal or regulatory requirements by the claimants, demonstrating that misunderstandings regarding land classification or project regulations were common. This indicates the builders' efficient legal strategies and preparedness to defend against allegations that could be seen as unfounded.

This analysis paints a picture of Das Infrastructure Private Limited as a builder that has managed to protect its image and operations in the face of legal challenges, successfully navigating through claims that, at times, may have stemmed from buyers' misinterpretations or unfounded accusations. It serves as a crucial reminder of the complexities involved in real estate transactions and the necessity for clarity in the relationships between builders and buyers.

To potential buyers, this information emphasizes the importance of diligence and informed decision-making. While it's essential to be mindful of legitimate disputes within the real estate market, it’s equally important to recognize that builders like Das Infrastructure Private Limited can and do defend themselves robustly against unjust claims. Buyers are encouraged to seek reliable information and not rush to judgment based solely on isolated incidents.