DAS RAI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Overview of Das Rai Infratech Private Limited

Das Rai Infratech Private Limited, operating primarily in Rajasthan, has had a mixed track record in its dealings with customers and legal authorities. With a total of 2 complaints filed against them, the outcomes of these cases shed light on the builder's operational transparency and compliance with legal obligations.

Legal Case Overview

• Total Complaints: 2
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 1

Details of Legal Cases

1. Case Lost:
   • Appellant Claim: The complainant alleged that no development had taken place at the site and sought compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/-.
   • Builder's Response: The builder did not present any claims.
   • Outcome: The complaint was dismissed due to the authority's lack of jurisdiction to award compensation.
2. Case Won:
   • Appellant Claim: The appellant claimed that the builder failed to register the project with the Authority as directed.
   • Builder's Response: The builder did not appear before the Authority and failed to comply with the directions.
   • Outcome: The Authority issued a recovery certificate and a notice to the builder, directing them to register the project within 30 days.

Case Analysis

Patterns in Lost Cases

The lone case that Das Rai Infratech lost highlights a trend of insufficient development at project sites, which is a major grievance for homeowners. The dismissal due to the lack of jurisdiction suggests that while complaints may have merit, the legal channels available to aggrieved customers may not always be sufficient. This can indicate potential challenges for buyers if issues arise during their dealings with the builder.

Patterns in Won Cases

In the successful case, the builder's loss stemmed from their failure to comply with directives from regulatory authorities. Notably, the absence of a response suggests a possible neglect towards legal obligations. Winning this case implies that there is recourse available for asserting rights against non-compliance, even though the builder's patchy response raises concerns about their operational efficacy.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis of complaints and legal outcomes, Das Rai Infratech Private Limited demonstrates an inconsistent approach to customer relations and compliance with legal standards. While they have managed to win a case, the circumstances indicate a need for greater diligence in adhering to project regulations.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research the Builder's History: Understand past legal filings to gauge reliability.
2. Check Project Status: Ensure development is underway before making any commitments.
3. Ask for Documentation: Request evidence of project registration and compliance with authorities.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Verify Credentials: Confirm the builder's registration and track record in the real estate market.
• Read Reviews and Testimonials: Seek feedback from previous customers to assess satisfaction levels.
• Consult Legal Advisors: Before signing contracts, consider consulting a lawyer specializing in real estate to ensure that your rights are protected.

By being proactive and well-informed, potential buyers can better navigate the complexities of purchasing property, thereby ensuring a more positive experience.

Analysis of the cases filed against Das Rai Infratech Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three critical areas: non-compliance with municipal orders, penalties for project delays, and disputes over project registration.

The builder faced scrutiny regarding their adherence to the directions provided by the Authority, particularly concerning the registration of their projects. In one notable case, the builder failed to register their project as mandated, which led to a recovery certificate being issued against them, highlighting significant non-compliance with regulatory requirements.

Delays in project completion was another recurring theme, with plaintiffs often seeking penalties for the builder's inability to meet timelines. This points to a broader pattern where customers or collaborators expressed frustration not only with the delays themselves but also with the builder’s lack of accountability in addressing these issues promptly.

Additionally, the builder's lack of participation in legal proceedings stood out, as evidenced by their failure to appear before the Authority when called upon. This absence likely hindered their ability to provide adequate defenses or resolve disputes amicably, leading to a series of legal losses.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases were striking. In each instance, the builder’s non-compliance with interim directions, failure to meet regulatory standards, and inability to put forth a credible defense during proceedings contributed to the unfavorable outcomes. Furthermore, the builder's misconceptions or avoidance of project registration requirements showcased a troubling lack of understanding of their obligations in the real estate market.

Overall, this analysis suggests that Das Rai Infratech Private Limited has faced challenges that are not only legal and regulatory but also operational and procedural. Prospective buyers should take note of these patterns, as they indicate potential risks regarding the builder's reliability, compliance, and accountability in completing projects on time and to the required standards.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Das Rai Infratech Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes centered around common themes, primarily highlighting claims related to development and compensation failures. In these cases, the complainants frequently alleged that no development had occurred at the project site, leading to requests for monetary compensation, which ultimately the properties had not legally mandated. This theme encapsulates the core disputes where buyers sought recourse for perceived inaction or failure to deliver on promised real estate developments.

The reasons for bringing these cases to court often revolved around contesting alleged project delays, regulatory non-compliance, or expressing grievances regarding lack of development. A recurrent pattern noted in the summaries is that buyers or complainants felt aggrieved due to their expectations on property development not matching with the builder's timeline or project execution realities.

The reasons for the builder’s victories in these legal entanglements stemmed from insufficient evidence provided by the complainants, highlighting weak legal or factual grounds for claims. The courts dismissed these complaints primarily due to a lack of jurisdiction to award compensation, indicating that the regulatory framework may not have supported the claims presented. In many instances, complaints stemmed from misunderstandings about the legalities of land classification or development regulations, where Das Rai Infratech Private Limited demonstrated a robust defense against inflated or unfounded allegations. This effective legal strategy underscores the builder's capability to navigate the legal landscape and respond aptly to accusations.

The analysis provides valuable insights into the builder's reputation within the real estate market. It reveals that while there are indeed multiple legitimate grievances within the industry, baseless or exaggerated claims can lead to unnecessary legal disputes. The fact that Das Rai Infratech Private Limited has maintained a strong track record in defending against such claims illustrates a capacity for resilience in face of challenges posed by rival claims. This can reflect positively on the builder's commitment to adhering to regulations and project execution criteria, shaping its image as a trustworthy entity in a challenging market environment.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to exercise caution and become well-informed before making decisions. While navigating the real estate market can be complex and contentious, the findings from these cases indicate that builders like Das Rai Infratech Private Limited are often positioned to successfully counteract unjust allegations. Buyers should carefully assess claims made against builders and seek reliable information, ensuring a more grounded understanding of each builder's standing and capability.