D.B. INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the real estate market, choosing a reliable builder is crucial for prospective homeowners. This blog will provide an in-depth analysis of D.B. Infrastructures Private Limited, a builder primarily active in Madhya Pradesh, to inform potential buyers about their legal track record and performance.

Overview of D.B. Infrastructures Private Limited

D.B. Infrastructures Private Limited has a meager record, with only one complaint lodged against them. However, it’s significant to note that the company is currently on the losing side of its legal battles, having lost one of the cases while failing to win any.

Legal Case Details

The lone case filed against D.B. Infrastructures painted a concerning picture regarding their performance. The key details of the case are as follows:

• Appellant's Claim: The applicant asserted that the builder did not complete the construction work, nor did they deliver possession of the property, despite the applicant having paid the full required amount.
• Respondent's Claim: The builder contended that delays were due to various reasons beyond control and argued against the applicant's entitlement to a high-interest rate.
• Final Verdict: The court ruled in favor of the applicant, awarding them the total sum of Rs. 5,06,000 along with interest at an annual rate of 42%.

Case Analysis

Patterns in Lost Cases

The case against D.B. Infrastructures reveals several telling patterns:

• Incompletion of Work: A significant factor in the complaint was the builder's inability to complete the construction on time or deliver the property, which reflects poorly on their project management capabilities.
• Financial Disputes: The contention over interest rates suggests possible miscommunication or poor financial handling, as the builder’s arguments did not succeed in contesting the applicant’s claims effectively.

Patterns in Won Cases

On the contrary, there were no cases won by D.B. Infrastructures Private Limited. This lack indicates a possible unsatisfactory track record and raises skepticism about their business operations and customer satisfaction.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, D.B. Infrastructures Private Limited presents a challenging option for potential homebuyers. Their solitary legal battle resulted in a loss, highlighting severe issues in project delivery and customer relations.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you are considering a purchase from D.B. Infrastructures or any builder with a similar profile, here are some tips:

1. Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's history, including the number of completed projects and feedback from previous consumers.
2. Seek Legal Guidance: If entering any agreement, consider having a legal expert review it to protect against potential issues.
3. Demand Transparency: Request detailed timelines and accountability assurances regarding project completion and possession delivery dates.
4. Look for Warranty or Guarantees: Ensure the agreement includes warranties for quality and timeliness of property handover.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Reputation: Look into online resources or community reviews about the builder's track record.
• Discuss Past Projects: Ask for information on similar past projects and visit them if possible to gauge quality.
• Engage with Past Clients: Speaking with previous buyers can provide insider insights about their experiences.

Ensuring a sound purchase decision is vital, and with thorough research, prospective buyers can navigate the complexities of selecting a builder like D.B. Infrastructures Private Limited.

Analysis of the cases filed against D.B. Infrastructures Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns underlying the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around three critical issues: delayed possession claims, disputes over project completion and payment, and interest rate disputes.

The most prominent theme is the Delayed Possession Claims. In these cases, the applicants primarily claimed that despite paying the full amount for their property, the builder failed to complete the construction work and did not provide possession of the promised units. This theme highlights a significant area of concern for potential buyers regarding the builder's reliability in meeting timelines and fulfilling contractual obligations.

Closely linked to the first theme is the category of Disputes over Project Completion and Payment. Here, the builder's defense often revolved around claims of delayed construction due to various unforeseen circumstances. However, the underlying issue in these disputes generally centered around the builder's failure to communicate effectively with buyers, provide updates on project timelines, or return payments on demand when projects were left incomplete.

The third theme involves Interest Rate Disputes, where buyers contested the builder's position on interest rates, often seeking compensation at rates that the builder deemed excessive. In the example outlined, the builder contested the applicant's entitlement to interest at the rate of 42% per annum, indicating a significant mismatch in expectations regarding financial repercussions for delays.

A common thread among these themes is the reasons why people brought cases to court. Many disputes arose from the builder's failure to meet project timelines, return payments, or align with buyer expectations regarding interest compensation. Buyers often found themselves in precarious situations, having made full payments without receiving the promised property or facing uncertainty regarding their financial investments.

The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Insufficient evidence to justify the delays, failure to comply with regulatory requirements regarding timelines and buyer rights, and a lack of transparency in communication with buyers are prominent reasons for the legal outcomes. Furthermore, the builder's challenge to the interest rates highlights a misunderstanding of the legal frameworks surrounding compensation for delays, which likely contributed to their losses.