No Logo Available

D.D. REALTY

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

An In-Depth Look at D.D. Realty: A Builder Review

When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home, careful consideration and research are essential. In this post, we take a closer look at D.D. Realty, a builder with a presence in Gujarat, to evaluate their track record and provide insights for potential buyers.

Company Overview

D.D. Realty is a builder operating in the state of Gujarat. With a relatively low number of complaints—just one recorded complaint to date—this company appears to have maintained a certain level of customer satisfaction. Notably, D.D. Realty has successfully navigated legal challenges, winning one case while losing none, thus painting a picture of a builder who stands firm in their commitments.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost

D.D. Realty has faced one legal challenge where the claimant alleged that the builder failed to deliver promised amenities. According to the appellant, facilities such as elevation bricks, an entrance gate, garden space, tree plantations, and a rainwater harvesting system were either inadequately provided or entirely missing. Furthermore, the complainant claimed that extra charges had been levied for booking garden-facing flats. However, the builder denied these allegations and asserted that all promised facilities were indeed delivered.

In this particular case, the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority reviewed the evidence and ultimately dismissed the complainant's appeal, siding with D.D. Realty. This outcome not only speaks to the builder's defense but also indicates that the regulatory authority found sufficient proof of the services offered as advertised.

Cases Won

D.D. Realty has a pristine record in winning cases, with no losses reported apart from the aforementioned situation. The builder's successful navigation of disputes suggests a robust approach to handling contracts and commitments made to clients, potentially reducing the risk of further claims or misunderstandings.

Key Patterns and Common Factors

In Lost Cases

The sole case against D.D. Realty highlighted a disconnect between customer expectations based on marketing materials and the actual services provided. Customer dissatisfaction often originates from perceived inadequacies in deliverables versus promises made at the time of sale.

In Won Cases

D.D. Realty's success in court signifies strong documentation and evidence supporting its claims regarding project completion and adherence to promises. The ruling in their favor demonstrates that the builder maintains integrity in their operations, effectively communicating their offerings to clients.

Conclusion

In conclusion, D.D. Realty presents a thoughtfully managed option for home buyers in Gujarat. Their ability to win cases demonstrates a solid foundation in fulfilling customer agreements, while the single case lodged against them indicates an area where clear communication could enhance the buyer's experience.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Research Thoroughly: Look into the builder's reputation, read reviews, and investigate their past projects before making a decision.
  2. Evaluate Amenities: Carefully examine promotional materials and ensure you have clarity on what is included in your purchase. Don’t hesitate to request verifiable details directly from the builder.
  3. Ask Questions: Engage with previous clients or visit completed projects to get firsthand feedback on the builder's reliability.
  4. Legal Review: Consider having a legal expert review the sale agreement to protect your interests.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  • Always check their licensing and regulatory compliance in the state.
  • Be wary of unusually cheap pricing, which may indicate compromised quality.
  • Assess the quality of previous projects and take note of recurring complaints.
  • Establish a clear line of communication with potential builders to ensure transparency throughout the process.

With these insights, potential buyers can approach D.D. Realty with a balanced perspective, ensuring informed decisions that align closely with their home-buying goals.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Disputes Over Provided Amenities Claims of Misrepresentation Customer Complaints About Facilities

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder D.D. Realty, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes primarily revolved around the facilities provided as per the promotional materials, with allegations that not all promised amenities were delivered.

Specific claims included the absence of elevation bricks, an entrance gate, garden, tree plantation, and a rainwater harvesting system, along with accusations of requiring additional payments for certain flats.

These cases were classified under the common theme of 'Disputes Over Provided Amenities.'

Various complaints were raised by buyers, often stemming from expectations set by promotional brochures that they felt were not met.

This led to repeated claims and allegations regarding the amenities provided by the builder. In this context, it’s clear that many disputes in the real estate sector arise from misunderstandings or miscommunications between builders and buyers.

On the defense side, D.D. Realty consistently maintained that they delivered all the promised amenities as outlined in their brochures.

The builder's ability to win these cases often stemmed from the opposing parties' lack of sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Furthermore, it appeared that misunderstandings concerning project specifications and the interpretation of municipal regulations may have contributed to the complaints.

D.D. Realty effectively countered accusations by demonstrating compliance with the statements made in their marketing materials and maintaining that all allegations were unwarranted.

This analysis of case outcomes reflects positively on the builder’s reputation within a competitive real estate market.

It also reveals a tendency for buyers to occasionally lodge claims that may be inflated or unfounded, suggesting a necessity for careful consideration before taking legal action.

The dismissals of lawsuits against D.D. Realty reinforce the understanding that builders can proactively defend against unjust claims through proper documentation and communication.

For potential buyers, this highlights the importance of making informed decisions. While there are certainly legitimate disputes within the real estate market,

this analysis shows that builders, like D.D. Realty, can often successfully defend themselves against erroneous accusations.

Buyers are encouraged to approach claims cautiously, seek reliable information, and form opinions based on comprehensive research rather than isolated disputes.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review