| CIN | U45201MH2007PTC174676 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Floor 3rd, Plot No - 3/8, Hamilton House J.N. Heredia Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai 400038 Mumbai Mumbai City MH 400038 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a reliable builder for your next property investment, understanding their track record is essential. This blog post will dive deep into the performance of Deepmala Infrastructure Private Limited, based on the limited but telling legal records available. With a focus on their complaint history, legal outcomes, and operational areas, we aim to provide prospective buyers with a clear perspective.
Overview of Deepmala Infrastructure Private Limited
Deepmala Infrastructure Private Limited has engaged in constructing projects primarily in Madhya Pradesh. While active in the market, it's important to note their legal standing, which may impact potential buyers' decisions.
Legal Case Insights
Complaints Summary
- Number of Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Case Details
The sole legal case against Deepmala Infrastructure involved a claim by an appellant who sought compensation due to delays in possessing two offices. The builder, in their defense, attributed …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Deepmala Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, with appellants seeking compensation for the builder's failure to deliver offices on time.
One of the most notable themes is the builder's reliance on the defense of unforeseen circumstances. In the case summarized, the respondent claimed that the delay in possession of two offices was due to circumstances that could not have been anticipated or controlled. However, the legal system did not accept this defense, and the builder was directed to pay interest at a rate of 6% per annum on the amounts paid by the appellant. This verdict indicates a degree of skepticism towards the unforeseen circumstances defense and a willingness to hold builders accountable for delays.
The common reason people brought cases to court in this instance was to contest …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from DEEPMALA INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.