| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate and construction, builders are often put to the test not only by project delivery timelines but also through legal challenges. One such builder, DEV CONSTRUCTION, has garnered attention due to its track record involving complaints and legal cases. In this blog post, we will delve into the performance of DEV CONSTRUCTION, examining the complaints lodged against them and the outcomes of their legal challenges.
Overview of DEV CONSTRUCTION
DEV CONSTRUCTION specializes in projects based in Madhya Pradesh. This geographic focus may indicate a regional strength; however, the builder's reputation is marred by legal disputes, having lost both of the cases filed against them.
Legal Case Details
In total, there have been two notable cases involving DEV CONSTRUCTION:
- Case 1: The applicant claimed delays in possession of a shop, asserting that despite paying the full consideration, the builder had not granted possession. DEV …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against DEV CONSTRUCTION, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases primarily revolved around two key issues: delayed possession claims and compensation for mental distress and expenses incurred by the applicants.
The delayed possession claims encompassed scenarios where the builder failed to grant possession of shops or flats to the buyers despite receiving full payment. The builder consistently attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances; however, the adjudicating officer ruled in favor of the applicants, indicating a lack of convincing evidence to support the builder's claims. This theme emerged in both cases summarized, highlighting an ongoing issue with project timelines and the builder's reliability in meeting deadlines.
The reasons people brought these cases to court primarily revolved around the failure to receive timely possession of their properties and the builder’s failure to return consideration amounts …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!