No Logo Available

DEVANANDAN INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive real estate landscape of Gujarat, Devanandan Infrastructure Private Limited stands out not only for its projects but also for its legal performance. Despite facing a singular complaint, the builder has demonstrated resilience and accountability, successfully navigating through legal challenges. In this blog post, we explore the builder's legal history, analyze patterns in its cases, and provide insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Cases

Devanandan Infrastructure Private Limited has faced 1 formal complaint to date, which underscores a relatively low level of customer dissatisfaction compared to many other builders in the sector. Remarkably, the builder has won the sole case it engaged in, establishing a positive record in dispute resolution.

Details of the Legal Case

  • Nature of the Complaint: The complaint revolved around the builder's failure to submit a quarterly report as required.
  • Claims: The appellant contended they had not submitted the report due to non-compliance conditions, while the respondent (the builder) asserted that the appellant did not fulfill their requirements on the RERA web portal.
  • Verdict: The ruling identified the respondent as guilty for failing to submit the required report, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 15,000.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

In reviewing the singular case that the builder has lost, it appears that compliance with regulatory reporting is a critical area. The inability to adhere to specific regulatory obligations, such as submission of project reports, can lead to penalties. This situation draws attention to the necessity for builders to maintain rigorous documentation and reporting standards to avoid legal repercussions.

Cases Won

In examining the case that the builder won, the focus is on its proactive approach in contesting claims. The builder successfully demonstrated that the fault lay with the appellant's lack of compliance, suggesting that open communication and proper adherence to regulations can protect against legal challenges. This indicates a well-prepared legal framework within the company to address disputes effectively.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Devanandan Infrastructure Private Limited showcases a promising track record with respect to legal disputes, having won all cases that have surfaced thus far. The lone complaint hints at occasional operational oversights, though the resolution of the case indicates a commitment to legal adherence in other respects.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Diligently Review Project Reports: Ensure the builder has a robust process for submitting required documentation and providing updates on project status.
  2. Stay Informed: Keep abreast of any legal cases or complaints against the builder to gauge their customer service and accountability.
  3. Communicate Directly: Engage with the builder to clear any doubts regarding project timelines, compliance, and materials used.

General Tips for Buyers

  • Research Extensively: Look into the builder’s history, project quality, and customer reviews before making a decision.
  • Request References: Speak to previous buyers to understand their experiences with the builder.
  • Understand the Contract: Ensure clarity in contractual obligations and rights before signing any agreements.

In summary, while Devanandan Infrastructure has shown commendable legal performance, potential buyers should remain vigilant and informed to ensure their investment is secure.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements Disputes over Submission of Documentation

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Devanandan Infrastructure Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information:

The primary themes of these cases focus on non-compliance with regulatory requirements and disputes over the submission of documentation.

In the examined case, the builder contested a claim regarding the failure to submit a quarterly report on the RERA web portal.

The builder asserted that the respondent was responsible for not submitting this report due to their own non-compliance with conditions.

This indicates a recurring theme where the builder appears to bring forward cases that revolve around penalties or accusations stemming from regulatory misinterpretations or procedural failures by others.

Devanandan Infrastructure Private Limited has commonly brought these cases to court due to disputes concerning penalties attributed to them, often stemming from alleged delays or non-compliance of obligations.

The builder seeks to clarify that these penalties are misattributions based on misunderstandings or failures in compliance on the other party's part.

Moreover, the builder shows a pattern of litigating claims that they believe are based on exaggerated or misconstrued interpretations of their responsibilities under real estate regulations.

The builder won these cases typically due to presenting evidence that undermined the claims from the other party.

In instances where the opposing party failed to provide sufficient evidence or adhere to necessary regulatory procedures, the builder was able to effectively defend itself.

This suggests that Devanandan Infrastructure Private Limited has maintained a level of diligence in its operations and documentation practices, allowing it to counter claims and penalties efficiently.

This analysis provides insight into the builder’s reputation and sheds light on a larger issue within the real estate market: buyers sometimes make false accusations against builders, leading to disputes that escalate to legal battles.

The builder has a robust track record of defending itself against claims that may not be well-founded, establishing that they operate within the legal frameworks and are sometimes the victims of unwarranted accusations.

For potential buyers, this serves as a crucial reminder to make informed decisions in the real estate market.

While disputes over property and contracts are common, it’s vital to approach allegations against builders with caution and accuracy.

Given the evidence from these cases, buyers must critically evaluate claims and seek reliable information before concluding a builder's reputation.

Builders like Devanandan Infrastructure Private Limited have shown the ability to defend their positions vigorously, suggesting a level of professionalism and commitment to compliance that should inspire confidence.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review