DHINGRA JARDINE INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Dhingra Jardine Infrastructure Private Limited has emerged as a notable player in the real estate sector within Haryana. However, potential buyers should be cautious when considering this builder due to a concerning track record. In this blog post, we will analyze the builder's complaint history, case outcomes, and offer valuable insights to help buyers make informed decisions.

Legal Case Summary

Dhingra Jardine Infrastructure Private Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which were lost. Interestingly, the details of these cases reveal a common thread – they both revolved around the builder's failure to deliver possession of a commercial shop despite significant payments made by the complainants.

Case Details:

1. Complainant's Claim: Both complainants alleged that they made a payment of Rs. 20,74,160 for a commercial shop but did not receive possession.
2. Builder's Response: In both instances, Dhingra Jardine did not file any reply or appear before the Authority.
3. Verdict: The Authority ruled in favor of the complainants, instructing Dhingra Jardine to hand over possession and pay delay interest of Rs. 12,59,862 plus a monthly interest of Rs. 18,241 until the possession was delivered.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost:

• Failure to Deliver Possession: The primary pattern observed within the cases lost by Dhingra Jardine is the failure to deliver possession of properties for which payments had been made. This raises questions about the builder’s project management and commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations.
• Lack of Response: In both cases, the builder did not show up to defend itself or provide any response to the allegations, suggesting a troubling lack of engagement in resolving disputes.

Cases Won:

• Directives from Authority: Even though the cases lost were also related to similar claims, the builder's failure to respond led to unfavorable outcomes. As such, there weren't any cases that Dhingra Jardine won; instead, the verdicts always favored the complainants. This lack of wins raises significant concerns about the company's reliability and reputation.

Overall Assessment

Based on the data reviewed, Dhingra Jardine Infrastructure Private Limited's performance in legal matters is troubling. With 2 lost cases and no wins, potential clients should approach this builder with caution. The consistent pattern of failure to deliver possession indicates risks associated with investment in their projects.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before engaging with Dhingra Jardine, conduct comprehensive research. Look into their project history, customer reviews, and any ongoing legal matters.
2. Ask for Documentation: Request clear timelines for project deliverables, and make sure to get everything in writing.
3. Consider Alternatives: Given the builder's track record, it may be wise to explore other builders with more favorable reviews and a proven record of timely project completions.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Check Complaints and Resolutions: Investigate any complaints against a builder and how they respond to them. A builder that engages with complaints positively is often a better choice.
• Look for Experience: Builders with a lengthy history in the industry are more likely to have robust processes in place for project management and customer service.
• Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit some of the builder's completed projects to ascertain the quality of work and adherence to timelines.

Conclusion

In summary, while Dhingra Jardine Infrastructure Private Limited may offer some attractive opportunities within Haryana's real estate market, buyers should exercise extreme caution. With a concerning record of losing legal cases and failing to meet obligations, potential customers should thoroughly evaluate their options and consider all factors before making any investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Dhingra Jardine Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into its dealings with clients and the legal implications of its actions.

The cases highlighted in this analysis primarily revolve around two common themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Penalties for Project Delays. In each case, the complainants cited failure to deliver possession of commercial shops despite having made substantial payments of Rs. 20,74,160. The builder's defense in these instances was nonexistent, as they failed to file a reply or appear before the Authority, leading to a default loss.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: the primary trigger for these legal disputes was the builder's inability to fulfill their contractual obligations regarding timely possession delivery. This is a critical issue in real estate transactions, as buyers expect and deserve to receive their properties on schedule. The penalties imposed by the Authority in these cases reflect the serious nature of these violations and serve as a deterrent against future delays.

The builder lost these cases predominantly due to their failure to put forth a defense or comply with the Authority's proceedings. This absence raises concerns about their operational legitimacy and commitment to client satisfaction. Furthermore, the substantial delay interests mandated by the Authority (Rs. 12,59,862/- and monthly interest of Rs. 18,241/-) indicate a significant shortfall in legal or regulatory compliance, underscoring the risks buyers may face when engaging with such builders.

Overall, this analysis suggests that prospective buyers should exercise caution when considering Dhingra Jardine Infrastructure Private Limited for their real estate needs, given the troubling track record exhibited in these cases.