No Logo Available

DHIRAL DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Dhiral Developers is a builder based in Gujarat, known for its involvement in residential projects. Like many builders, they face legal challenges, and understanding their performance through available legal cases can help potential buyers make informed decisions.

Legal Case Overview

According to the data, Dhiral Developers has faced a total of one complaint, and in this particular case, they lost. Despite coming under scrutiny, the lack of multiple cases indicates limited exposure to legal disputes, which could suggest a relatively stable operational environment.

Details of the Case

  • Appellant Claim: The complainant alleged that Dhiral Developers failed to provide several promised facilities, as outlined in the promotional brochure. This included amenities like a compound wall, number plates, and road repairs.
  • Respondent Claim: Dhiral Developers countered by stating that they had offered some of the requested facilities and argued that the complainant's demands were unreasonable.
  • Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the complainant, mandating that the builder must deliver the missing facilities within 45 days.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

The single case that Dhiral Developers lost highlights a common issue often encountered in the real estate sector—failure to deliver promised amenities. This suggests that potential buyers should exercise caution, as unmet expectations can lead to disputes post-purchase.

Cases Won

Interestingly, there are no recorded cases that Dhiral Developers has won. This might indicate a tendency for the builder to settle matters without seeking further legal recourse or a potential pattern of consistently losing in disputes.

Conclusion

Based on the limited information available, Dhiral Developers has demonstrated some challenges in upholding commitments made to buyers, as reflected by the lost case where facilities were not delivered as promised. Conclusively, this may raise red flags for potential buyers who value adherence to contractual promises.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Verify Promises: Ensure that any amenities or facilities promised are detailed in writing and backed up with a contract.
  2. Research Past Performance: Look into past reviews and complaints filed against the builder for better insight into their reliability.
  3. Inspect Current Projects: If possible, visit ongoing projects to assess the quality and progress and gauge whether the builder is indeed providing the promised facilities.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  1. Check Credentials: Confirm that the builder is registered and has the necessary licenses to operate in your area.
  2. Seek Recommendations: Talk to past customers to get firsthand information on their experience with the builder.
  3. Examine Legal History: Analyze any legal disputes the builder has been involved in to understand their reliability.
  4. Compare Options: Don't rush to choose; compare multiple builders to see who offers the best value and reliability.

In summary, while Dhiral Developers provides a residential option in Gujarat, potential buyers should critically evaluate their offerings and past legal disputes before making a purchase.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Failure to Provide Promised Facilities Disputes over Contractual Obligations

Analysis of the cases filed against Dhiral Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two key themes: the failure to provide promised facilities and disputes over contractual obligations.

The first theme encompasses claims made by the complainants that the builder did not deliver various facilities as promised in the brochure. These facilities included a compound wall, number plates, road repair, and several others. The builder's defense was rooted in their assertion that they had provided some facilities and that the demands from the complainants were excessive. However, the authority ruled against the builder, mandating the provision of the promised facilities within a 45-day timeframe.

A pattern emerges from this summary: the common trigger for litigation in these cases was the builder's failure to meet contractual obligations, particularly concerning the promised amenities which are crucial for homebuyers’ satisfaction and community building. The complainants, in exercising their rights, highlighted the importance of transparency and adherence to promotional materials in real estate transactions.

The builder's loss in these cases can be attributed to several factors, including insufficient evidence to support their claims of having provided adequate facilities and a lack of compliance with the regulatory requirements set forth by the authority. This underscores the importance for builders to not only fulfill their promises but also to maintain proper documentation and adherence to legal standards to defend against potential lawsuits.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review