DHOOT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS LIMITED

Introduction

Dhoot Infrastructure Projects Limited is a builder operating primarily in Haryana. Like many construction companies, it has faced legal challenges from buyers. In this blog post, we will explore the complaints against Dhoot Infrastructure, analyze case outcomes, and offer insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Complaints

Dhoot Infrastructure Projects Limited has accumulated a total of 9 complaints to date. Disturbingly, the builder has not won a single case, with all 9 cases resulting in losses. This raises concerns for prospective buyers considering investment in property from this builder.

Cases Filed and Lost

Dhoot Infrastructure has lost 3 cases where complaints were filed against them. The primary pattern in these cases is centered around claims of payment disputes:

• Common Factors in Lost Cases:
  • Payment Disputes: All three cases involved complaints from the appellant asserting that they had fulfilled their payment obligations. However, the builder consistently countered with claims regarding …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Dhoot Infrastructure Projects Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed possession claims and claims related to the rectification or clarification of orders.

The majority of the cases (six out of six) involved delayed possession claims, where the complainants sought compensation for the builder's failure to deliver properties on time. These claims often included a request for delayed possession charges along with the prescribed rate of interest. The builder's defense typically hinged on claims that their applications for rectification were valid, stating they were filed for clarification rather than to address errors or mistakes in the orders. However, the authority consistently ruled in favor of the complainants, indicating that the builder's applications did not meet the necessary criteria for rectification as outlined in the relevant legislation.

A pattern emerges …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Dhoot Infrastructure Projects Limited, which it lost, revealed several recurring themes.

The primary disputes can be grouped into three major categories: Payment Disputes, Pre-deposit Non-compliance, and Regulatory Issues.

• 1. Payment Disputes: These cases involved the builder claiming that they had made the necessary payments as required, but the respondents consistently disputed these claims. In such disputes, the core of the disagreement often rested on the evidence of payment and whether the payments met the obligations outlined in the contracts. This recurring pattern indicates potential issues with record-keeping or miscommunication between the parties involved.
• 2. Pre-deposit Non-compliance: A notable reason leading to dismissals was the builder’s failure to comply with the required pre-deposit as mandated by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This theme highlights a crucial regulatory requirement that the builder couldn't meet, leading …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis