CIN | U45400TG2012PLC079980 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | H.NO:1-120/M/T/312, TEJA BLOCK MY HOME NAVADWEEPA APARTMENTS,MADHAPUR , HYDERABAD, Telangana, India - 500081 |
Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the world of real estate and construction, the reputation of a builder can significantly influence buyer decisions. Today, we delve into the details surrounding Dhruthi Infra Projects Limited, a builder operating in Karnataka, that has an interesting legal history. With one recorded complaint and a case lost, it is essential to analyze what this means for potential buyers.
Dhruthi Infra Projects Limited has a presence in Karnataka and has recently encountered legal challenges. The data indicates that they have received one formal complaint, which culminated in a case that the builder lost. Notably, they have not won any cases thus far.
The legal issue that Dhruthi Infra Projects Limited faced involved a complaint that ultimately was dismissed. The final verdict indicated that the dismissal was due to the continuous absence of the parties involved. This suggests that there might have been either a lack of engagement or preparation regarding the complaint, raising questions about the builder's approach to addressing grievances.
Dhruthi Infra Projects Limited has lost one case, which highlights a potential challenge in their dispute resolution strategies. The case's dismissal due to parties' absence suggests that there may be issues related to communication or commitment to addressing complaints. Such patterns can raise red flags about how current and potential clients’ concerns might be addressed in the future.
Interestingly, Dhruthi Infra Projects Limited does not have any cases won, indicating either a lack of disputes resolved in their favor or an absence of proactive legal engagement. With no successful cases to highlight, it becomes essential for potential buyers to consider this aspect before making a purchase decision.
In summary, Dhruthi Infra Projects Limited's legal history reflects serious considerations that potential buyers should keep in mind. The single complaint, coupled with the loss of that case, may imply possible challenges in the builder's customer service approach and overall reliability.
In conclusion, while Dhruthi Infra Projects Limited operates in a promising market, potential buyers ought to exercise caution and conduct detailed assessments before finalizing any purchases.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
The analysis of the cases filed by DHRUTHI INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED, where the builder lost, reveals a complex landscape of disputes primarily revolving around delays and regulatory compliance issues.
Firstly, categorizing the disputes into common themes provides clarity on the type of challenges the builder faced. The first theme is "Delayed Possession Claims," which typically involves disputes wherein the builder contests penalties or seeks relief due to alleged delays in possession delivery. It appears that the construction timelines may frequently have been contentious, leading to court involvement.
The second theme addresses "Non-compliance with Legal Requirements," where the builder's failure to adhere to specified municipal and regulatory orders stands out. This category is crucial, as non-compliance can lead to penalties, fines, or project freezes, triggering legal confrontations.
Additionally, "Disputes Over Regulatory Compliance" often surface in the builder's litigation. These cases appear to relate to the builder's disagreements concerning land classifications or municipal regulations, underscoring the importance of being aligned with legal norms and standards.
In observing the reasons why DHRUTHI INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED brought cases to court, it seems that the primary motivations included contesting penalties for project delays, disputing accusations of non-compliance that potentially impacted their operations, and challenges related to land classification disagreements. These cases represent a recurring pattern where the builder sought judicial intervention, possibly to mitigate financial losses or preserve their project timelines.
However, the common reasons leading to the builder's losses in these cases signal areas of concern. Issues such as insufficient evidence presented in court, a failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, disregard for interim directions set by the court, or misinterpretations of land/project classifications often contributed to unfavorable outcomes.
This analysis indicates a serious need for the builder to improve its adherence to legal protocols and maintain robust documentation to avoid similar losses in future disputes. The recurring nature of these issues suggests a gap in operations and understanding of regulatory frameworks, warranting a concerted effort to rectify these shortcomings for better business resilience and customer satisfaction.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!