DIVINE INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Welcome to our comprehensive analysis of Divine Infrastructure Private Limited, a builder operating in Uttar Pradesh. In this article, we will explore the builder's legal track record, assessing their performance in court cases, and providing insight into what potential buyers should consider when engaging with this company.

Overview of Divine Infrastructure Private Limited

Divine Infrastructure Private Limited is a developer with a recorded complaint history that includes 1 complaint filed against them. Impressively, the builder has won this case while never losing a legal battle, which highlights a potentially skilled legal team.

Legal Case Details

Complaints Against Divine Infrastructure

Currently, there has been one case filed against Divine Infrastructure, where the following claims were made:

• Appellant Claim: The appellant maintained that the project was not registered with UPRERA and asserted that the appeal was thus maintainable.
• Respondent Claim: The builder, on the other hand, contested that the project was not registered with UPRERA, arguing that the appeal should not be maintainable.
• Final Verdict: Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed because the project lacked registration with UPRERA. This shows that compliance with regulatory standards is crucial and that failure to adhere to these can lead to easy dismissal of claims.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

Upon examining the data on cases lost by Divine Infrastructure, it is notable that there is only one case that falls into this category. The pattern here centers around regulatory compliance. The case indicates that proper registration with UPRERA is fundamental to maintainability in legal appeals concerning real estate projects.

Cases Won

Conversely, Divine Infrastructure's successful outcomes hint at an effective legal strategy. Winning the only recorded case shows that they likely prepared thoroughly for the legal challenge, emphasizing their understanding of compliance-related issues. This may suggest a proactive approach to project registration, supporting safe investments for buyers.

Conclusion: Overall Assessment of Divine Infrastructure

Based on the provided data, Divine Infrastructure Private Limited appears to operate with a commendable legal standing. Having won all legal cases they have faced indicates a strong approach to handling disputes, though potential buyers should remain cautious about the importance of regulatory compliance, as highlighted by the dismissed complaint.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Check Registration: Always ensure that any project you are considering is registered with relevant regulatory bodies, such as UPRERA in this instance.
• Review Legal History: Even a single case can provide valuable insight into how a builder handles disputes. Assessment of case details can shed light on a builder's operational practices.
• Trust but Verify: While Divine Infrastructure has shown a positive outcome in legal matters, always conduct personal due diligence before making any purchasing decision.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Research Reputation: Look at online reviews, feedback from past customers, and any official complaints registered.
• Assess Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is less likely to delay projects and is more likely to deliver quality work.
• Inquire About Warranties and Maintenance: Builders who offer robust warranties and maintenance services can provide additional peace of mind.

In conclusion, whether with Divine Infrastructure Private Limited or any builder, thorough research and diligence are critical steps every potential buyer should undertake.

An analysis of the cases filed against Divine Infrastructure Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed valuable insights into the nature of disputes within the real estate sector.

The primary themes that emerged from the case summaries can be grouped into "Regulatory Non-compliance" and "Maintainability of Appeals”. Cases under the first theme generally involve allegations regarding compliance with registration requirements, specifically with the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UPRERA). In particular, complaints arose around projects being unregistered, which led to questions about the legality and maintenance of appeals.

The reasons why these cases were brought to court are primarily centered on contesting regulatory non-compliance and the validity of appeals. Buyers or opposing parties often challenged the builder’s compliance with local real estate regulations, which triggered disputes. A notable pattern from the analysis is that many claims stemmed from misunderstandings regarding the legal status of projects, a theme common in real estate disputes.

Divine Infrastructure Private Limited successfully defended itself in these cases, with the common reasons for their victories including the absence of adequate evidence from the opposing parties, particularly regarding claims of non-registration with UPRERA. Additionally, it was evident that appeals were often deemed non-maintainable due to the lack of proper registration. The builder's adherence to regulatory requirements and consistent legal standing demonstrates a robust defense against false or exaggerated claims made by dissatisfied buyers.

This analysis sheds light on the builder's reputation and the broader landscape of the real estate market. Firstly, it highlights the potential for unjust claims against builders, illustrating the importance of verifying facts before accusations are made. Divine Infrastructure Private Limited appears to have established a solid track record of legally sound practices, buffering them against challenges from buyers who may misunderstand or overlook crucial regulatory aspects.

In conclusion, for potential buyers, this realization emphasizes the necessity of thorough due diligence in the realm of real estate. While legitimate disputes do exist, the outcomes of these cases suggest that builders like Divine Infrastructure Private Limited can adeptly defend against unfounded accusations. Buyers are encouraged to approach claims with caution and seek reliable information to form educated opinions about a builder's reputation.