D.M. B. INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

D.M. B. Infratech Private Limited operates primarily in Chhattisgarh and has been involved in recent legal disputes pertaining to their project registrations. This blog seeks to analyze the builder's track record, focusing specifically on the nature of complaints against them, their outcomes in legal cases, and what this may imply for potential real estate buyers.

Overview of Legal Challenges

D.M. B. Infratech Private Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which have resulted in losses for the builder. The cases revolved around the builder's failure to submit necessary documentation for the registration of their project 'Kalpvriksh' in compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Summary of Legal Cases

1. Case Outcome: The appellant, Chhattisgarh RERA, claimed violations of Sections 3(ii) and 4(2) due to non-submission of mandatory documents. The builder countered by asserting that all documents were submitted, attributing the issue to the appellant's processing of their application. However, the application's registration was ultimately rejected, leading to the confiscation of the amount deposited by the builder.
2. Case Outcome: Similar claims were made again by the appellant regarding the non-submission of documents, with the builder making the same defense. The verdict in this instance mirrored that of the previous case, ending with a rejection of the registration and confiscation of funds.

Analysis of Case Patterns

Common Factors in Lost Cases:

• Documentation Issues: Both cases involve claims of inadequate documentation, indicating a potential systemic issue within the builder’s administrative processes regarding project registration.
• Consistent Rejection: The verdicts across both cases reflect a pattern of courts siding with the appellant based on the builder’s inability to meet regulatory document submission requirements.

Common Factors in Won Cases:

• Not Applicable: There are no cases won by D.M. B. Infratech Private Limited in the context provided; thus, no favorable outcomes or defenses can be drawn from their legal history.

Conclusion

D.M. B. Infratech Private Limited's legal track record raises concerns for potential buyers. With two consecutive legal losses due to non-compliance with regulatory requirements, buyers should approach any purchases with caution.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder’s reputation, legal history, and projects to understand their standing in the market.
2. Documentation Verification: Ensure that all necessary documentation related to the project is available and meets legal standards before making any investments.
3. Seek Expert Advice: Consult with real estate professionals or legal advisors to better understand the implications of any builder's history on your prospective purchase.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Check Reviews and Ratings: Look for independent reviews and feedback from previous customers regarding their experiences.
• Examine Project Completion Rates: A builder’s history of timely project completions can be an indicator of reliability.
• Assess Financial Stability: Ensure that the builder has the financial backing to complete and maintain projects effectively.

By following these guidelines, potential buyers can make informed decisions when selecting builders, particularly in light of the challenges faced by D.M. B. Infratech Private Limited.

Analysis of the cases filed against D.M. B. Infratech Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their dealings with the Chhattisgarh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). The cases primarily revolved around two common themes: non-compliance with the mandated documentation required for project registration and disputes stemming from incomplete applications.

The builder faced penalties due to a consistent pattern of insufficient documentation. In each case summarized, D.M. B. Infratech claimed to have submitted the necessary papers for their project 'Kalpvriksh,' yet the regulatory body determined that the documentation was inadequate, leading to a violation of sections 3(ii) and 4(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. This suggests a troubling trend where the builder may have been attempting to expedite the registration process without fulfilling the required standards, potentially to commence sales or construction prematurely.

The underlying reasons for these disputes appear to center around a fundamental misunderstanding or disregard for the RERA's requirements. The builder's defense often revolved around their perception that the issues lay not with their application but rather with the processing capabilities of the Chhattisgarh RERA. However, the final verdicts indicate that the responsibility for the discrepancies and violations rested with the builder, as evidenced by the rejection of their registration applications and the confiscation of the deposited amounts.

The patterns emerging from these cases highlight the importance of thoroughness and compliance in real estate ventures. Builders like D.M. B. Infratech must recognize that adhering to the RERA's regulations is crucial for the successful registration of projects, and failure to do so can result in significant legal and financial repercussions. For potential buyers, these cases serve as a warning to conduct diligent research into a builder's history with local authorities before making any investment decisions. They should seek builders who have previously registered projects without issues, as this would indicate a commitment to quality and adherence to regulatory standards.