DOBRIYA ASSOCIATES

Overview of Dobriya Associates

Dobriya Associates operates in Gujarat and currently has a record of 1 complaint filed against them. Legal proceedings involving builders can significantly influence buyer confidence, making it crucial to analyze the information available about Dobriya Associates thoroughly.

Legal Case Summary

Cases Won

• Number of Cases Won: 0

Cases Lost

• Number of Cases Lost: 1
• Details of the Case: The complaint against Dobriya Associates stemmed from an alleged violation of the RERA Act, where it was claimed that the builder failed to submit quarterly reports on time. The builder defended itself by asserting that any delays were not intentional and requested leniency. However, the authority found the builder at fault and imposed a penalty of ₹50,000.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Patterns in Lost Cases

The single case lost by Dobriya Associates highlights a crucial aspect of builder compliance with regulatory standards, particularly the RERA Act. The violation involved administrative responsibilities, specifically the timely submission of reports. This suggests that there might be systemic issues in project management or compliance adherence within the company.

Patterns in Won Cases

It’s notable that Dobriya Associates has not won any cases. This absence of victories indicates potential challenges in their legal defenses or limited success in dispute resolution mechanisms. Consequently, this lack of successful outcomes could be a warning signal for potential buyers.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the current legal landscape surrounding Dobriya Associates raises some red flags. With only one complaint leading to a loss and a monetary penalty imposed, the builder may have some underlying issues with compliance and operational management.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before deciding to purchase a property from Dobriya Associates, conduct comprehensive research into their past projects, customer reviews, and any legal issues they may have faced.
2. Ask About Compliance: Engage directly with the builder to understand how they ensure compliance with regulatory requirements like the RERA Act.
3. Seek Legal Advice: Consider consulting with a legal expert familiar with property laws to help you navigate your options should you choose to proceed with Dobriya Associates.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Review Past Projects: Look at previous work to gauge quality and craftsmanship.
• Check for Complaints: Investigate if there have been any complaints or legal issues against the builder and how those were resolved.
• Request References: Ask for referrals or testimonials from previous clients to better understand the builder's reputation.
• Understand Contracts: Ensure you thoroughly read and understand all terms in the contract before signing, especially regarding project timelines and payment schedules.

By considering these factors, buyers can make an informed decision and potentially avoid any pitfalls when engaging with Dobriya Associates or any builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against Dobriya Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for reporting delays.

The first type of case involves regulatory non-compliance, specifically in relation to the RERA Act. In one significant case, the appellant claimed that Dobriya Associates had failed to submit quarterly reports on time, which is a violation of the provisions laid out in the Act. This highlights a pattern where cases are often brought against the builder for not adhering to legal reporting requirements.

People commonly contest these cases for several reasons. One major factor is the imposition of penalties for delays; the builder may dispute the severity of the penalty or argue that the delay was beyond their control. In the case mentioned, the respondent claimed that they had not deliberately violated the provisions and requested leniency. This indicates another pattern where builders often attribute delays to external factors rather than accepting fault.

The verdicts in these cases suggest that builders like Dobriya Associates frequently lose due to insufficient evidence to support their claims of innocence or mitigating circumstances. In the cited case, the authority imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000, demonstrating the legal system's emphasis on compliance and timely reporting.

Overall, these cases serve as a warning to potential buyers about Dobriya Associates' track record with legal compliance and reporting composure. It reveals a tendency towards late reporting, which could indicate broader operational inefficiencies or lapses in project management. Buyers should consider this carefully when weighing their options in the market.