DURGA PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 2
- States (Active in): Karnataka
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Assessing Durga Projects and Infrastructure: What Buyers Should Know
When considering a property investment, it's essential to evaluate the reputation and legal standing of the builder. Durga Projects and Infrastructure Private Limited has gained attention in the real estate market of Karnataka, but how does their track record hold up under scrutiny? In this blog, we will explore the complaints against the builder, the cases they have lost, and their legal outcomes to provide a comprehensive overview for potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
Durga Projects and Infrastructure Private Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which have resulted in losses for the builder. This raises significant concerns regarding their reliability in delivering properties as promised.
Cases Overview
- Case 1: The plaintiff alleged that the developer delayed possession of the flat and sought compensation. The developer countered that the plaintiff had neglected to pay holding charges and that possession was granted as per the agreement. The final verdict indicated that the authority directed the plaintiff to submit a formal complaint while the developer was instructed to document the costs incurred.
- Case 2: The complainant claimed a possession delay of 294 days and sought delayed compensation per RERA regulations. The developer argued that the delay stemmed from unforeseen circumstances and stated that compensation had already been provided as agreed. The adjudicating officer ruled in favor of the complainant, directing the developer to pay compensation according to RERA laws and to deliver possession within a set timeline.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Patterns in Lost Cases
- Common Claims: Both cases revolved around delayed possession, highlighting a significant issue with timeline adherence. Prospective buyers may find this particularly concerning if they rely on timely delivery for their housing plans.
- Lack of Compensation Adherence: The builder also failed to meet compensation obligations in both cases, indicating a possible pattern of neglecting financial responsibilities towards homeowners.
Patterns in Won Cases
Interestingly, while Durga Projects and Infrastructure Private Limited has not won any legal cases, the outcomes suggest a struggle in defending their practices relating to project delivery and compensation claims. The lack of any verdicts in their favor reflects poorly on their operational reliability.
Conclusion
Based on the data available, Durga Projects and Infrastructure Private Limited has a troubling legal history with two lost cases concerning delays and a lack of accountability toward their clients. Potential buyers should approach this builder with caution.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before making a purchase, ensure to review all available information regarding the builder's reputation and past legal issues.
- Seek References: Talk to existing homeowners and individuals familiar with the builder's projects to gather first-hand experiences.
- Scrutinize Contracts: Pay close attention to the terms in the purchase agreement, especially concerning possession timelines and compensation clauses.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check for Licenses and Registrations: Ensure that the builder is properly licensed and registered under appropriate real estate laws such as RERA, ensuring their accountability.
- Assess Financial Stability: A builder's financial position can impact project completion timelines and quality. Investigate their financial standing if possible.
- Review Previous Projects: Look into the quality and completion records of the builder's past projects, specifying on-time delivery and customer satisfaction.
By staying informed and vigilant, you can make a more confident decision when choosing a builder for your next property investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Durga Projects and Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, resulting in compensation disputes, and the builder's compliance (or lack thereof) with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) rules.
The delayed possession claims formed the crux of the cases, with plaintiffs often citing significant delays in the delivery of their flats. For instance, in one case, the complainant asserted that the builder had delayed possession by 294 days, which is a substantial deviation from the promised timeline. The builder's defense typically hinged on unforeseen circumstances, but this defense did not resonate with the adjudicating officer, who emphasized the importance of adhering to the timelines established under RERA.
Compensation disputes were another recurring theme. Plaintiffs sought delay compensation as mandated by RERA, while the builder contested either the amount or the obligation to pay, claiming adherence to their agreements. The verdicts consistently favored the plaintiffs, indicating a systemic issue where the builder may not have acknowledged or fulfilled their obligations regarding delay compensation.
The underlying reason for these disputes appears to stem from the builder's failure to meet project timelines and comply with regulatory requirements, particularly concerning compensation payouts. The patterns emerging from these cases suggest that buyers were often driven to litigation by the builder's inability to deliver properties on schedule and their subsequent failure to compensate buyers for these delays as required by law.
The common factor in the builder's losses is their inability to align their practices with RERA rules, coupled with a lack of valid evidence to support their claims of unforeseen delays and their compliance with payment obligations. The verdicts serve as a warning to buyers, indicating potential systemic issues within the builder's operations that could impact future purchases.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/180709/0001021 | Karnataka | The complainant, Kaveri Malatesh Dammalli, filed … | Delay in possession… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Kaveri Malatesh Dam… | Durga Projects and … | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=192017 |