DURGESH SHARMA

Introduction

When it comes to purchasing property, understanding a builder's track record is crucial. In this post, we dive into Durgesh Sharma, a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh, analyzing his performance based on the complaints and legal cases filed against him.

Overview of Legal Cases

Durgesh Sharma has faced a total of two complaints, both of which have resulted in losses for him. The cases revolve around claims of incomplete development work and failure to provide possession of properties after receiving payment.

Case Summary

1. The first case involved an applicant who claimed that the builder did not complete the development work and failed to provide possession of the plot, even after receiving the money. The builder, in response, claimed that the applicant did not present adequate supporting evidence for their claims. However, the adjudicating officer ruled in favor of the applicant, ordering the builder to pay the amount with interest and additional compensation.
2. The second case mirrored the first, with similar claims of incomplete work and possession issues. The builder contended that the applicant was uncooperative and did not provide necessary documentation. Again, the decision favored the applicant, resulting in a loss for the builder.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

In reviewing the cases lost by Durgesh Sharma, a clear pattern emerges:

• Incomplete Development: The primary issue revolves around the allegation that the builder did not complete promised development work.
• Failure to Deliver Possession: Customers reported not receiving possession of their properties despite making full payment.
• Lack of Evidence: A consistent factor is the builder's reliance on claims that the applicants did not provide sufficient evidence. This defense was ineffective in swaying the adjudicating officer’s decisions.

Cases Won

Interestingly, the information indicates that while there are cases won, upon closer inspection, both recorded cases are actually losses for the builder. Therefore, any historical perception of case wins may require re-evaluation since the adjudged decisions were unfavorable for Durgesh Sharma.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Durgesh Sharma has encountered significant challenges regarding customer satisfaction and legal compliance. His track record reveals a concerning ability to complete projects and provide possessions, leading to unfavorable judicial outcomes.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Due Diligence: Potential buyers should conduct thorough research. Review legal history and seek testimonials from previous customers before engaging with Durgesh Sharma.
2. Document Everything: Ensure all agreements and communications are documented to avoid miscommunication in the future.
3. Seek Legal Counsel: Consider consulting with a legal expert when negotiating with builders to navigate potential pitfalls.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Credentials: Verify the builder's licenses and certifications.
• Review Past Projects: Examine the quality and completion of previous work.
• Read Reviews: Look for feedback from past clients to gauge overall satisfaction.
• Ask Questions: Don’t hesitate to ask about timelines, costs, and the handling of potential disputes.

Navigating the real estate landscape can be complex, but being informed and vigilant can help secure a positive home buying experience.

Analysis of the cases filed against builder Durgesh Sharma, which he lost, reveals significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding his legal disputes. Notably, the cases primarily revolve around two common themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Failure to Complete Development Work.

In each instance, the applicant claimed that despite paying the agreed consideration, the builder failed to complete the promised development work and did not provide possession of the plot. These cases highlight an overarching issue of non-fulfillment of contractual obligations by the builder, leading to dissatisfaction and legal action from the buyers.

The reasons people commonly brought cases to court against Durgesh Sharma primarily center around the frustration caused by delays and the inability to obtain their promised properties. Applicants often contested the builder's inaction, arguing that he had received the necessary payments yet had not delivered on his commitments. This pattern indicates a significant breakdown in communication and trust between the builder and his clients.

Furthermore, the builder's defense consistently revolved around claims of insufficient evidence provided by the applicants. However, the legal verdicts did not favor the builder, as the adjudicating officer ruled that he must repay the amount owed, including interest and compensation. This suggests that the builder's defenses were inadequate and failed to meet the required legal standards, perhaps due to a misunderstanding of the regulatory framework or mismanagement of buyer expectations.

In conclusion, the cases against Durgesh Sharma serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers. They underline the importance of thorough due diligence when engaging with builders, ensuring that they have a reputable track record of completing projects on time and fulfilling their obligations. Buyers should be vigilant and proactive in their approach, ready to advocate for their rights if necessary, and consider working with real estate consultants to navigate the complexities of property acquisition effectively.