EASTERN ESTATE CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in):
| CIN | U45201BR2012PTC018555 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 26-Apr-12 |
| Address | HOUSE NO - 2, MIHIR PATH EAST BORING CANAL ROAD, PS - BUDDHA COLONY PATNA Patna BR 800001 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the world of real estate, the credibility of a builder can make a significant difference in a buyer's experience. Today, we take a close look at Eastern Estate Construction & Developers Private Limited, evaluating their performance based on available legal case data. With one complaint filed against them and the details of their legal encounters, we aim to provide insights that prospective buyers should consider.
Overview of Legal Cases
Eastern Estate Construction & Developers Private Limited has faced a relatively low number of complaints, specifically totaling one. Notably, they have not won any legal cases and have lost one. Below is a summary of the case against them:
- Case Overview:
- Appellant Claim: Not provided
- Respondent Claim: Published advertisement without proper clearance
- Final Verdict: The case was closed following the respondent's apology and compliance with the order.
Analysis of Legal Performance
Patterns in Cases Lost
Eastern Estate Construction & Developers has a distinct pattern in their lost case, related to advertising practices. The details indicate that the builder faced scrutiny for an advertisement they published without the requisite clearance. This suggests a potential area of concern regarding their compliance with regulatory standards and practices. Such incidents may raise questions about the builder's diligence in following legal norms and serving their customers' best interests.
Patterns in Cases Won
Interestingly, the builder hasn't won any cases according to the data provided. This absence of successful legal outcomes could signify a pattern where disputes, if any arise, may not favor the builder. It’s important for potential buyers to be cautious and consider this lack of legal victories when evaluating the overall reliability and trustworthiness of the builder.
Conclusion
Based on the available data, Eastern Estate Construction & Developers Private Limited appears to have a challenging track record concerning legal compliance. With one lost case addressing significant legal concerns related to marketing practices, potential buyers may want to conduct further due diligence before making decisions.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate any builder’s past legal cases and their outcomes. This information can offer crucial insights into the builder's operational standards and consumer relations.
- Ask for References: Speak to previous clients about their experiences. A builder’s reputation among existing customers is often a strong indicator of their reliability.
- Review Legal Documentation: Ensure all agreements are clear and transparent. Misunderstandings can lead to legal disputes, so clarity in contracts is vital.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check for Credentials: Ensure the builder has all necessary licenses and certifications to operate in your locality.
- Examine Previous Projects: Visiting completed projects can provide tangible evidence of the builder’s quality and style.
- Assess Customer Service: The responsiveness and attentiveness of a builder can significantly impact your experience throughout the purchasing process.
In summary, while Eastern Estate Construction & Developers Private Limited has very limited complaints on record, their lost case should be a red flag for potential buyers. Always conduct thorough research to make an informed decision.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Eastern Estate Construction & Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight two primary areas of concern: non-compliance with municipal orders and disputes over project advertising and clearance.
In the realm of non-compliance, the cases often revolved around the builder's failure to adhere to regulatory requirements imposed by local authorities. This might include everything from obtaining necessary permits before commencing construction to ensuring that all marketing materials comply with legal standards. The builder's apology and compliance with orders in the case of published advertisements without proper clearance illustrate a pattern where legal action serves as a corrective measure, enforcing accountability and transparency in the real estate market.
The disputes over project advertising and clearance predominantly involve allegations of misleading or premature advertising. In these cases, plaintiffs often claim that the builder published promotional materials for projects without first obtaining the requisite approvals or clearances. Such practices can lead to false expectations among potential buyers, a factor that likely contributes to the legal challenges faced by the builder.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court include the builder’s failure to secure proper clearances, which raises questions about their operational integrity and commitment to regulatory compliance. The apology issued by the builder indicates a acknowledgment of fault and a willingness to rectify errors, highlighting a pattern where legal pressure can lead to a resolution that reaffirms legal requirements in real estate promotions.
The builder's losses in these cases primarily stem from their inability to meet regulatory standards and their failure to provide adequate evidence to support their actions. Non-compliance with legal requirements, particularly in sensitive areas such as advertising, demonstrates a lack of due diligence that undermines trust in the builder's operations. Furthermore, the cases reveal a degree of disorganization or negligence on the part of the builder, as exemplified by the expedient resolution through apology and compliance, which suggests that the infractions may have been avoidable had proper protocols been followed.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9/18 | Not provided | Complaint case closed due to respondent's apology… | ["Advertisement wit… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | ORERA | Eastern Estate Cons… | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CC-No.9.18.pdf |