CIN | U45400TN2012PTC086724 |
---|---|
Year Established | 13 July 2012 |
Address | SURVEY NO. 865/2D , POLLIVAKKAM VILLAGE, Tamil Nadu, India - 602002 |
Company Status | Private |
In the ever-growing real estate market, choosing the right builder can be a daunting task. One developer gaining attention is Eco Bay Developers and Builders Private Limited, currently active in Tamil Nadu. This blog post delves into the performance of Eco Bay in terms of legal disputes, customer complaints, and project execution.
Eco Bay Developers has faced a minimal number of complaints, with only one recorded instance. This singular complaint led to a legal case that provides insight into the builder's operational challenges and legal standings.
Given that Eco Bay Developers has lost one case, it reflects a significant issue in fulfilling their contractual and regulatory obligations. The complaint indicated matters regarding unmet deadlines and unregistered projects, which could signify problems in project management and communication with stakeholders.
The builder was able to demonstrate that they had taken steps towards TNRERA registration and claimed that external factors caused project stalls. The ruling allowed them to continue with their development but indicated a reliance on claims of natural and financial difficulties rather than strong legal defenses.
While the singular case against Eco Bay Developers does not paint an entirely bleak picture, it does raise red flags about their operational effectiveness and project management capabilities. Potential buyers should proceed with caution, weighing the risks associated with potential delays in project completion and the builder's ability to navigate legal and regulatory obligations.
In summary, while Eco Bay Developers and Builders Private Limited has logistical and legal obstacles to overcome, potential buyers should remain vigilant and informed before making any commitments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Eco Bay Developers and Builders Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and disputes over project completion and handover.
Many of the claims made by the complainants were centered around the builder's failure to complete the construction on time and to register the projects with the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA). Many plaintiffs sought directives for the builder to complete their apartments within a reasonable timeframe or to provide a refund of their investment along with interest for the delays.
A common reason for the litigation in these cases was the builder's defense of project delays attributed to external factors such as floods and financial difficulties. However, despite these defenses, the builder was often found to be in non-compliance with critical regulatory requirements, which led to legal ramifications. The pattern that emerges from these summaries indicates that the builder’s litigation often stemmed from an inability to meet project timelines and fulfill contractual obligations, resulting in legal disputes over delayed possession and unmet expectations.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely completion and compliance. The fact that the builder received TNRERA registration in 2018, yet failed to complete projects by promised deadlines, highlights significant operational and regulatory failures. The courts were unconvinced by the builder's defenses, particularly when respondents were unable to adhere to court-ordered timelines for completion and handover.
In conclusion, the cases against Eco Bay Developers and Builders Private Limited serve as a cautionary tale for potential homebuyers. They underline the importance of scrutinizing a builder's past projects, regulatory compliance, and legal standing before making any investment. Buyers should be aware of common triggers for litigation, such as delayed possession and unfulfilled promises of timely completion, and should take steps to protect their interests accordingly.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C.No.152 of 2017 | Tamil Nadu | The complainant booked an apartment with the resp… | ["Unregistered real… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Thiru S.Muthumanick… | Eco Bay Developers … | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2017/152-2017.pdf |