
CIN | U70109DL2014PTC267659 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | L-1/1100, First Floor Street No 25, Sangam Vihar NA New Delhi South Delhi DL 110062 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
ELAN BUILDCON Private Limited is a builder located primarily in Haryana and Gurugram. Analyzing their legal history can provide insights for potential buyers considering investments from this developer. This blog delves into the recent cases involving ELAN BUILDCON, assessing their successes and failures, and offering guidance for prospective homeowners.
Legal Overview of ELAN BUILDCON
According to available data, ELAN BUILDCON has faced a total of 85 complaints. Out of these, they won 33 cases and lost 52. Given the legal challenges this builder has encountered, it is crucial to understand the nature of these cases and the outcomes to evaluate their reliability and reputation in the market.
Cases Won by ELAN BUILDCON
The builder has been successful in 24 of the cases they filed themselves and 51 cases filed against them. Notable patterns in successful cases include:
- Jurisdictional Challenges: Many of the cases won by ELAN involve the …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder ELAN BUILDCON Private Limited that it lost reveals significant insights regarding the patterns and common themes in these legal disputes. A careful examination of the summaries highlights several recurring themes in the builder's litigation efforts.
- Settlement Disputes: One of the prominent patterns observed is the involvement of settlement claims. The builder often found itself in disputes over alleged agreements reached between them and the respondents. This raises the issue of whether the builder accurately understood or fulfilled settlement terms, which often led to complicated legal battles. An unresolved settlement can significantly impact timelines and project execution, resulting in further disputes.
- Disputes Over Compliance with Regulatory Provisions: Another key theme is the builder's claims regarding pre-deposits under certain legal provisions. This indicates that the builder may frequently challenge the interpretation of regulatory or statutory requirements, often leading …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.
The cases involving ELAN BUILDCON Private Limited primarily centered around themes of jurisdictional challenges and disputes over financial refunds. A notable recurring pattern in these cases is the builder’s claim that the Adjudicating Officers handling the complaints lacked the jurisdiction or competency to adjudicate on issues related to refunds. This highlights a frequent point of contention where the legal basis of the complaints was questioned, suggesting potential lapses or misunderstandings on the part of the opposing parties.
The builder commonly contested decisions made by the Adjudicating Officers that prescribed refunds or financial remedies. The builder argued that these decisions were outside the legal framework, which often led to remittance back to the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority for reevaluation. The underlying reasons for these disputes seem to stem from either interpretations of legislation or …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ELAN BUILDCON Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily fell into three categories:
- Settlement Deeds: Many cases were resolved through settlement deeds, indicating that the parties reached some form of amicable resolution outside of court. This suggests a pattern where both parties may have found common ground to resolve their issues without prolonged litigation.
- Disputes Over Allotment Claims: In one particular case, a dispute arose regarding the specific commercial space/unit allotted to a complainant. The opposing party contended that a different unit was agreed upon, with the builder providing evidence through the signature on the agreement confirming the allotment of unit No. 25 instead of the claimed unit No. 62.
- Refund Requests and Cancellation of Agreements: Another notable case involved a complainant demanding a refund for a cancelled agreement concerning a shop …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!