| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Understanding Elegance Properties: A Builder Profile with Insights
When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home, understanding their track record is crucial. In this post, we will delve into the profile of Elegance Properties, a builder operating in Haryana with a unique legal history that is worth noting.
Overview of Elegance Properties
Elegance Properties is a builder located in the state of Haryana. Currently, they have one recorded complaint against them, and they have triumphed in each case they have contested, with a record of one case won and none lost.
Legal Case Analysis
- Cases Lost:
- Case Summary: The only legal issue involving Elegance Properties stemmed from a complaint by the authority alleging that a project was not registered, even though the land was licensed. In their defense, the builder asserted that the project hadn’t been officially launched yet, and since the building plans were not approved, it couldn't be registered. The final verdict concluded that the project was indeed not registerable with the authority.
- Patterns Identified: The pattern emerging from this case suggests confusion or miscommunication regarding project registration and development status. In this instance, the authority's claim was based on the assumption that a registered project was in the pipeline, which wasn’t the case according to the developer. It reflects a potential oversight in clarity about project launches and approvals.
- Cases Won:
- Current Standing: Elegance Properties has managed to win one case with no losses. This speaks volumes about their ability to navigate legal intricacies and present their case effectively. The absence of any lost cases highlights their sound legal standing and capability in managing disputes.
- Patterns Identified: The successful defense in cases reflects that they have a determined approach when defending their projects and a clear understanding of legal requirements when it comes to launching and registering their developments.
Conclusion: Overall Assessment of Elegance Properties
Based on the provided data, Elegance Properties exhibits competence in managing legal challenges, successfully defending their practices and standing firm against claims. While they have one complaint on record, the outcome suggests that issues may arise more from misunderstandings about regulations than from poor execution of projects. However, potential buyers should remain vigilant and seek clarity on the registration status of upcoming projects.
Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Elegance Properties
- Request Detailed Project Information: Always ask for clarity on the registration status and approvals of any proposed projects.
- Verify Legal Standing: Investigate any ongoing projects and their compliance with local regulations to ensure that the builder’s claims align with reality.
- Engage with Current Residents: Getting feedback from individuals who have already purchased from Elegance Properties can provide personal insights into the builder’s reliability and quality of workmanship.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Research Reputation: Look into the builder's history, read reviews, and check with regulatory bodies to determine their standing.
- Assess Communication: Choose a builder who communicates openly and regularly throughout the construction process.
- Understand Financing and Warranty Options: Ensure that you are aware of all financial commitments and warranty coverages offered.
- Inspect Previous Projects: If possible, visit completed projects by the builder to gauge quality and customer satisfaction.
In summary, while Elegance Properties has shown potential in their operations, potential buyers should conduct thorough diligence to ensure a successful and satisfactory investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The central themes emerging from these cases highlight issues mostly related to the non-registerability of projects and the associated regulatory compliance.
The cases filed against Elegance Properties primarily revolve around disputes over whether projects were eligible for registration with the authority. In the specific case outlined, the authority claimed that the project was not registered, despite the builder having licensed land. The builder's defense was robust, stating that the project had not yet been launched and that the building plans had not received approval, which rendered the project non-registerable. This theme of regulatory compliance versus authority requirements was a recurring pattern observed in these disputes.
Most cases were brought to court due to contentious claims concerning delays in registration or requisite approvals. Regulatory bodies or opposing parties, often aiming to hold builders accountable for perceived non-compliance, initiated these complaints. There was a clear pattern in these disputes—many involved claims that builders had failed to meet necessary regulations or timelines.
The reasons why Elegance Properties were successful in defending against these claims often hinged on the lack of sufficient evidence from the opposing party to support their allegations. In the detailed case discussed, the builder effectively demonstrated that the project was non-registerable due to the absence of necessary approvals, a crucial factor that ultimately led to the dismissal of the case. Clearly, misunderstandings regarding land classification and the intricacies of project approval processes played a significant role in these disputes.
This analysis reflects positively on the builder’s reputation, illustrating that Elegance Properties has shown resilience and a commendable track record in defending itself against unsupported accusations. It offers a broader insight into the real estate market, indicating that unfounded claims can sometimes lead to legal battles for builders. Buyers may sometimes be misinformed or exaggerate claims against builders, which can lead to disputes; however, the successful defense of Elegance Properties reinforces the importance of verifying claims before drawing judgments.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to approach claims against builders with caution. While disputes may arise within the realm of real estate, this analysis underscores the fact that builders like Elegance Properties often prevail when faced with unjust accusations. It is essential for buyers to seek reliable information and make informed decisions when it comes to assessing a builder's reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1176/2018 | Haryana | The case was disposed as the project has not been… | ["Non-registration … | {"appellant_claim": "The authority claimed that t… | Haryana Real Estate… | Elegance Properties | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/NzI1Nw== |