EMPEROR INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When it comes to investing in real estate, especially through a builder, understanding the reputation and reliability of that builder is crucial. In this blog post, we dive into the profile of Emperor Infratech Private Limited, a builder operating primarily in Haryana. By analyzing available data regarding complaints and case outcomes, we aim to equip potential buyers with insights to make informed decisions.

Company Overview

Emperor Infratech Private Limited has established its presence in the Haryana state but has a notable record with customer grievances and legal battles. With one documented complaint against them and an unfavorable outcome in a case, a closer examination of their track record is warranted.

Legal Case Analysis

Case Details

The builder faced a complaint where the:

• Appellant Claim: The complainant sought a refund due to delayed possession of a flat and cited a violation of the Flat-Buyers Agreement.
• Respondent Claim: Emperor Infratech Private Limited argued that they were unable to hand over possession of the flat.
• Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the complainant, directing the builder to refund the amount paid along with interest at a rate of 9.70%.

Patterns in Cases Lost

The case illustrates a clear pattern: the delayed possession of property is a significant issue for Emperor Infratech. They failed to fulfill contractual obligations, leading to a ruling against them. This indicates potential challenges regarding timelines and commitments, raising concerns for prospective buyers about their reliability in delivering properties on schedule.

Patterns in Cases Won

Interestingly, it should be noted that the builder has no cases won. This may indicate a reluctance or inability of Emperor Infratech to defend their actions in court effectively or a consistent pattern of failing to meet purchaser expectations, as seen from the one legal outcome available.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Emperor Infratech Private Limited has a limited yet troubling track record when it comes to legal disputes. With one significant case lost concerning delayed possession and no victories, it raises red flags regarding the builder’s reliability and customer satisfaction.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Thorough Research: Before investing, conduct extensive research on the builder’s history, including customer reviews and legal disputes.
2. Check for Project Completion Timelines: Inquire about past projects and their completion timelines to gauge the builder's reliability.
3. Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with the Flat-Buyers Agreement and your rights as a buyer to ensure that you are protected in case of delays.
4. Consult Legal Experts: Before making any commitments, consult with a legal expert to understand the implications of agreements and potential risks.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder is licensed and recognized by relevant authorities.
• Review Past Projects: Visit completed projects to assess quality and workmanship directly.
• Ask for References: Request contact information for previous buyers to get first-hand accounts of their experiences.
• Examine Financial Stability: A financially sound builder is more likely to complete projects on time and meet contract obligations.

In summary, while Emperor Infratech Private Limited may have projects in Haryana, the revealed issues regarding their customer complaints and legal outcomes warrant caution. By following the outlined tips, potential buyers can help protect their investments and make informed decisions.

Analysis of the cases filed against Emperor Infratech Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into delayed possession claims, refund disputes, and non-compliance with contractual obligations.

The cases often revolved around the builder's failure to deliver possession of flats on time, which led to claims from buyers seeking refunds based on the violation of the Flat-Buyers Agreement. Buyers commonly contested the builder's position by arguing that the delays were not only significant but also resulted in mental distress and financial burdens, as they were unable to move into their purchased homes. The builder, on the other hand, consistently claimed inability to hand over possession, often citing external factors beyond their control. However, the legal authorities did not accept this defense and directed the builder to refund the amounts paid by the complainants, indicating a degree of disfavor towards the builder's reasoning.

A notable pattern in these cases is the frequent invocation of the Flat-Buyers Agreement. It suggests that buyers were not only aware of their rights under the contract but were also proactive in seeking legal recourse when the builder failed to adhere to the agreed terms. This implies a growing sophistication among home buyers and a willingness to stand up against potential malpractice in the real estate sector.

The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Insufficient evidence to justify the delays, failure to comply with the contractual obligations, and a lack of convincing arguments to mitigate their responsibility for the possession delays were prominent reasons. The authorities' decisions highlight the importance of transparency and adherence to agreements in the real estate industry, and builders should take note of these rulings to improve their operations and customer service.