EVEREST CONBUILD logo

EVEREST CONBUILD

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the dynamic world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring quality and compliance with regulations. In this blog, we will take a close look at EVEREST CONBUILD, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. We will analyze their legal track record and provide insights for potential buyers.

Builder Overview

Name: EVEREST CONBUILD
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Filed Against EVEREST CONBUILD

Throughout the builder's legal encounters, one particular case stands out:

  1. Summary of the Case:
    • Appellant Claim: The authority alleged that EVEREST CONBUILD violated the RERA Act by failing to submit quarterly reports on time.
    • Respondent Claim: The builder contended that they were unaware of the new regulation and indicated that there was no intent to violate the law. They expressed regret and requested leniency regarding the imposed penalty.
    • Final Verdict:

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Penalties for Project Delays Disputes over Legal Compliance

Analysis of the cases filed against Everest Conbuild, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues in three primary areas: regulatory non-compliance, penalties for project delays, and disputes over legal compliance.

The first theme, regulatory non-compliance, is exemplified by the builder's violation of the RERA Act. In one notable case, the authority claimed that the promoter failed to submit quarterly reports on time. This reflects a broader pattern of neglecting regulatory obligations, which is a common trigger for legal action against builders.

The reason people brought cases to court in this instance was primarily to contest the penalties imposed for non-compliance. The builder's defense—that they were unaware of the new law and did not intend to violate it—indicates a lack of diligence in understanding legal requirements. This lack of awareness is a critical factor in many of the builder's losses, as it …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from EVEREST CONBUILD?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.