EVERGREEN DEALCOM PRIVATE LIMITED logo

EVERGREEN DEALCOM PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Madhya Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, making informed decisions is paramount for potential buyers. This blog post focuses on EVERGREEN DEALCOM Private Limited, a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh. By delving into their legal standing, especially the complaint history and cases litigated, we aim to provide valuable insights for prospective clients.

Builder Overview

Name: EVERGREEN DEALCOM Private Limited Number of Complaints: 1 Cases Won: 0 Cases Lost: 1 States with Projects: Madhya Pradesh

Legal Case Details

Summary of Cases

The only recorded case against EVERGREEN DEALCOM illustrates a situation where the applicant complained of delayed possession of a property. The applicant sought compensation for this delay, while the builder cited unforeseen circumstances as the reason for the holdup. Ultimately, the ruling mandated that the builder must hand over possession within three months while also compensating the applicant at a rate of Rs. 8,500 per month for the delay.

Analysis

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against EVERGREEN DEALCOM Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed possession claims and penalties for project delays.

The delayed possession claims were predominantly filed by buyers who alleged that the builder had failed to deliver their units within the agreed-upon timelines. For instance, in one significant case, the applicant sought compensation for the delay in possession of their cell, asserting that the builder had exceeded the stipulated period. The builder, on the other hand, attributed the lag to unforeseen circumstances and requested additional time to complete the construction. However, the Adjudicating Officer ruled against the builder, directing them to grant possession within three months and to pay compensation at the rate of Rs. 8,500/- per month for the delay.

A common reason people brought cases to court was to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review