EVERGREEN DEALCOM PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Madhya Pradesh
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, making informed decisions is paramount for potential buyers. This blog post focuses on EVERGREEN DEALCOM Private Limited, a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh. By delving into their legal standing, especially the complaint history and cases litigated, we aim to provide valuable insights for prospective clients.
Builder Overview
Name: EVERGREEN DEALCOM Private Limited Number of Complaints: 1 Cases Won: 0 Cases Lost: 1 States with Projects: Madhya Pradesh
Legal Case Details
Summary of Cases
The only recorded case against EVERGREEN DEALCOM illustrates a situation where the applicant complained of delayed possession of a property. The applicant sought compensation for this delay, while the builder cited unforeseen circumstances as the reason for the holdup. Ultimately, the ruling mandated that the builder must hand over possession within three months while also compensating the applicant at a rate of Rs. 8,500 per month for the delay.
Analysis
Patterns in Lost Cases
- Delay in Possession: The primary complaint against EVERGREEN DEALCOM relates to delays in delivering property, indicating a potential pattern of time management issues in project timelines.
- Unforeseen Circumstances: The defense raised by the builder highlights that external factors could have contributed to project delays. Still, the inability to win any cases suggests a recurring concern among buyers regarding delayed completion.
Patterns in Won Cases
- As it stands, EVERGREEN DEALCOM does not have any cases won against them. This figure indicates that the builder has faced challenges in defending their position legally, pointing towards a potential inability to uphold contractual commitments concerning project timeliness.
Conclusion
In summary, EVERGREEN DEALCOM Private Limited has recently experienced issues with delayed property possession, facing legal repercussions for their failure to deliver projects on time. With one documented complaint leading to a lost case, prospective buyers should proceed with caution, keeping in mind the importance of timely project delivery.
Tips for Potential Buyers Considering EVERGREEN DEALCOM
- Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's previous projects to gauge competence and reliability. Verify any timelines and delivery commitments.
- Ask for References: Speak with past buyers about their experiences, particularly regarding on-time possession and customer service.
- Scrutinize Contracts: Before signing, make sure to read and understand all terms, particularly regarding possession timelines and penalties for delays.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Verify the builder’s registration and past project success.
- Understand Legalities: Familiarize yourself with local laws and regulations to know your rights as a buyer.
- Visit Completed Projects: Look at previous works by the builder to assess their quality of construction and adherence to timelines.
- Negotiate Terms: Ensure you negotiate terms that protect your interests, particularly concerning deadlines and compensations for any faults.
By educating yourself and following these tips, you can better navigate the exciting yet complex process of purchasing property and reduce the risks associated with dealing with builders.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against EVERGREEN DEALCOM Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed possession claims and penalties for project delays.
The delayed possession claims were predominantly filed by buyers who alleged that the builder had failed to deliver their units within the agreed-upon timelines. For instance, in one significant case, the applicant sought compensation for the delay in possession of their cell, asserting that the builder had exceeded the stipulated period. The builder, on the other hand, attributed the lag to unforeseen circumstances and requested additional time to complete the construction. However, the Adjudicating Officer ruled against the builder, directing them to grant possession within three months and to pay compensation at the rate of Rs. 8,500/- per month for the delay.
A common reason people brought cases to court was to contest the builder's failure to adhere to project timelines and to seek rightful compensation for these delays. There was also a pattern where the builder consistently cited unforeseen circumstances as their defense, yet this did not resonate with the legal authorities, leading to a series of rulings against them.
The builder's losses in these cases could be attributed to several factors. Notably, the builder's defense of unforeseen circumstances was not only repeated but also insufficiently evidenced. The decisions from the Adjudicating Officer suggest that the builder failed to meet the required standards of timely project completion, which is a legal obligation in real estate development. Moreover, the builder's failure to comply with interim directions likely contributed to the unfavorable outcomes.
In conclusion, the analysis highlights the significance of adherence to timelines and contractual obligations in real estate transactions. Buyers should be vigilant and informed about their rights, particularly concerning delayed possession and the possibility of obtaining compensation. Meanwhile, builders must ensure that they fulfill their commitments; otherwise, they could face legal repercussions, as seen in the cases against EVERGREEN DEALCOM Private Limited.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4--87-48-0528 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Abhijit Chakra… | Evergreen Dealcom P… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/211121313594.pdf |