CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a new home, potential buyers often look for reputable builders with a proven track record. EVITA Constructions Private Limited, primarily active in Tamil Nadu, has been under scrutiny due to complaints and legal cases brought against them. In this blog post, we will examine the builder's complaint history and analyze their legal battles, particularly regarding a recent case they lost.
EVITA Constructions has one documented complaint. The details of this complaint reveal critical insights about the builder's operational practices and responses to customer disputes.
In the case against EVITA Constructions, the complainant alleged that they had booked a flat in the Modena-1 project at Hiranandani Palace Gardens, Chennai, but were met with delays and a lack of progress on the project. The builder's defense claimed that the complainant should seek recourse from M/s. Palace Gardens Chennai SEZ Pvt. Ltd., which is a separate entity currently under liquidation. The final verdict from the authority directed the complainants to pursue their claims before the Official Liquidator of the High Court of Bombay, indicating that the resolution was not in favor of the complainant.
The case lost by EVITA Constructions underscores a significant issue within the company: the reliance on third-party developers. In this instance, their defense pointed to an external organization that was already facing liquidation. This suggests that potential buyers might face difficulties not directly related to EVITA but stemming from the complexities involved with partnering entities.
Interestingly, EVITA has not won any cases to date. Therefore, no trends or favorable resolutions can be highlighted in their favor, which raises concerns about their overall reliability and accountability in managing customer transactions and complaints.
Overall, the track record of EVITA Constructions Private Limited raises red flags for potential homebuyers. With a solitary case resulting in a loss and no victories on record, coupled with their response strategy focused on blaming external entities, prospective buyers may want to tread carefully before proceeding with any purchases associated with this builder.
By being vigilant and informed, potential buyers can make better decisions and navigate the home-buying process with confidence.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against EVITA Constructions Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed possession claims and disputes over project ownership and responsibility.
Many of the claims made by the complainants fell under the category of delayed possession, where buyers expressed frustration where the builder failed to deliver completed units within a reasonable timeframe. The case of the complainant who booked a flat in the project Modena-1 at Hiranandani Palace Gardens, Chennai, is a notable example. Despite their investment, there was no progress on the project and the builder had not handed over the property, leading to legitimate claims of delay.
The second theme involved disputes over who held ownership and responsibility for various projects. In the aforementioned case, the builder contested the claim by stating that the complainant had entered into an agreement with another company, M/s. Palace Gardens Chennai SEZ Pvt. Ltd., which was under liquidation. This indicates a troubling trend where builders may attempt to deflect accountability by pointing to other companies or complexities in project ownership, especially in cases where those companies may be experiencing financial difficulties.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting delays, disputing ownership, and disagreements over where relief should be sought. Complainants often found themselves in precarious positions, unsure of who to hold accountable for delays or how to obtain their promised properties. The builder’s defense mechanisms, such as attributing responsibility to other companies, highlight a pattern of evasion rather than transparency.
The conclusion of these cases reveals a concerning set of outcomes for the builder, as the authority typically found in favor of the complainants, albeit often by directing them to pursue relief through other legal avenues. This suggests that EVITA Constructions may have insufficiently met its obligations, resulting in legal repercussions. The builder’s losses could be attributed to various factors, including a lack of evidence to support their claims of responsibility, non-compliance with contractual obligations, and a general failure to meet project timelines.
Overall, these findings paint a picture of a builder that has faced significant challenges in fulfilling its commitments to customers. Buyers considering investments with EVITA Constructions should take these patterns into account when making their decisions.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!