CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Exact Developers & Promoters Private Limited has been a player in the real estate market, particularly in the state of Haryana. This blog aims to analyze the builder's performance based on the available information, shedding light on its legal history and providing insights for potential buyers.
Exact Developers & Promoters Private Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. In examining these cases, we can gather significant insights into the operational challenges and reputational risks associated with this builder.
Based on the limited legal history available, Exact Developers & Promoters Private Limited has encountered significant legal challenges. The trend of losing cases related to delivery failures raises concerns about ethical practices and operational capabilities. While the builder has been active in Haryana, their history of non-compliance with timely delivery obligations may deter potential buyers.
When considering Exact Developers & Promoters Private Limited, awareness of their legal history and customer feedback is paramount. The patterns seen in their past legal challenges highlight the necessity for prospective buyers to approach with caution, doing meticulous research and ensuring all contractual elements are clear and in their favor. Stay informed and make prudent choices!
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Exact Developers & Promoters Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases primarily revolved around two key topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes over Payment and Possession.
The Delayed Possession Claims involved complaints from buyers who alleged that the builder failed to deliver possession of their units within the agreed-upon timeframe. In these cases, the buyers sought refunds for the amounts they had paid. A pattern emerged where the builder consistently attributed the delay to the buyers themselves, claiming that they had not paid outstanding dues or taken possession of the units. However, the authority did not accept this defense and ultimately directed the builder to refund the payments, indicating a failure on the builder's part to fulfill their contractual obligations.
Disputes over Payment and Possession were also prevalent, with the builder claiming that buyers failed to take possession and pay what they owed. However, the verdicts suggested that the builder's attempts to shift the blame were not convincing, as the focus remained on the builder's inability to deliver units on time. Common triggers for litigation in these cases included the builder’s failure to meet project timelines and fulfill their commitments, which led buyers to contest the status quo and seek refunds.
The reasons for the builder's losses in these cases were strikingly similar. In each instance, the builder's defense was rooted in a perceived failure by the buyers, rather than acknowledging any fault in their own operations. This led to a consistent failure to meet the authority's expectations, resulting in refund directives. The builder's losses could be attributed to insufficient evidence to support their claims, a lack of compliance with the agreed-upon terms, and possibly a misunderstanding of their obligations regarding timely project completion.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!