FACILITY PLUS ESTATE MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction
Facility Plus Estate Management Private Limited is a prominent player in the Punjab real estate market, known for its involvement in various projects. However, like any builder in the industry, it faces customer complaints and legal challenges. In this article, we will explore the builder’s legal history, particularly focusing on the nature of complaints received and the outcomes of legal cases.

Legal Case Overview
The builder has recorded a total of 9 complaints against it. Notably, they boast an impeccable record in terms of legal outcomes, having won all 9 cases brought against them with zero losses. This points to a significant trend where complaints were dismissed and identified as lacking merit.

Patterns in Legal Complaints

An analysis of the complaints reveals some common factors:

• Claims of Unfulfilled Promises: All complaints stem from allegations that the builder failed to deliver promised facilities and amenities within the projects.
• Maintenance Charges Dispute: Complainants contested their obligation to pay maintenance charges, arguing that the non-delivery of promised amenities absolved them of this duty.
• Respondent's Defense: The builder consistently defended itself by stating that the complainants had willingly signed maintenance agreements, thus declaring themselves responsible for maintenance charges despite any perceived shortcomings in project delivery.
• Final Verdicts: The outcomes consistently ruled in favor of Facility Plus, as the complaints were deemed without merit.

Analysis of Legal Outcomes

The builder’s success in all contested cases suggests:

• Strong Legal Ground: The builder appears to have a robust legal framework, allowing it to effectively counter claims regarding provided facilities.
• Documentation and Agreements: The consistent reference to signed maintenance agreements indicates a strong emphasis on contract law, signifying that the builder prepares and reinforces agreements meticulously.

Overall Assessment
Given the data, Facility Plus Estate Management Private Limited can be seen as a builder with a strong record of overcoming legal challenges. The absence of lost cases reinforces a positive image in the eyes of the law. However, potential buyers should remain vigilant and conduct thorough due diligence before making a purchase decision.

Tips for Potential Buyers
When considering a purchase from Facility Plus or any builder, keep the following tips in mind:

• Review Contract Details: Always meticulously review all agreements, especially those concerning maintenance and amenities promised.
• Research Builder’s Track Record: Look into the builder's history, including any complaints and how they have been addressed.
• Seek Feedback from Current Owners: If possible, gather insights from current residents in the projects to assess satisfaction levels regarding amenities and overall living conditions.

Conclusion
Facility Plus Estate Management Private Limited demonstrates a strong legal standing with impressive case outcomes. While they maintain a reputable position against customer complaints, potential homeowners must ensure they are informed and protected by understanding their contractual obligations.

By following these guidelines, buyers can make educated choices that align with their needs and expectations.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Facility Plus Estate Management Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around two key themes:

1. Disputes Over Maintenance Charges: Many complaints centered around the argument that the builder "failed to provide the facilities and amenities that were promised as part of their projects. As a result, complainants asserted they should not be liable for maintenance charges. This claim was repeatedly brought to court, presenting a pattern of dissatisfaction among buyers regarding the services provided post-purchase.
2. Non-provision of Promised Facilities and Amenities: Complainants consistently claimed that the amenities promised at the time of sale were not delivered, leading to disputes about financial obligations agreed upon in the maintenance contracts.

The cases were brought to court primarily due to dissatisfaction with the builder's performance in delivering the promised facilities and apprehensions about financial responsibilities associated with maintenance. This pattern indicates a common frustration that many buyers experience in the real estate market when their expectations are not met.

The reasons for the builder’s success in these cases predominantly stem from the robustness of their defense. In all instances, the builder effectively pointed out that the complainants or their predecessors had willingly signed maintenance agreements and were therefore bound by their terms. There was a consistent lack of substantial evidence presented by the opposing parties, indicating that claims were either exaggerated or unfounded. Additionally, the contracts presumably provided a legal framework that upheld the builder's stance against non-compliance accusations. Many claims, when scrutinized, seemed to stem from a misunderstanding of the obligations or incorrect assumptions about the builder's responsibilities.

This analysis shines a light on the reputation of Facility Plus Estate Management Private Limited. It illustrates that while disputes do arise in real estate transactions, the builder maintains a strong track record of defending itself against what can sometimes be seen as frivolous or exaggerated claims from buyers. Such legal precedents indicate that not everything brought to court reflects the reality of the situation and that builders can often successfully navigate through the challenges posed by buyer complaints.

For potential buyers, this highlights the importance of making informed decisions when entering into real estate contracts. While it is crucial to address legitimate disputes in real estate, the outcomes of these cases show that builders like Facility Plus Estate Management Private Limited can often successfully counter false accusations. Buyers are advised to approach claims with caution, seek credible information, and ensure they have a clear understanding of their agreements before forming opinions about a builder’s reliability and reputation.