CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
If you are in the market for a new home in Madhya Pradesh, you may come across Fame Developers. Understanding their track record, especially in legal matters, can help inform your purchasing decision. This blog post will analyze the complaints against Fame Developers, the outcomes of their legal cases, and provide essential tips for potential buyers.
Fame Developers has been involved in one notable legal case which they did not win, providing crucial insights into their operational conduct and customer relations.
In the one case filed against Fame Developers, the appellant claimed that the builder failed to complete the construction of the building and did not provide possession of the plot, despite having received payment. On the other hand, Fame Developers contended that the applicant had not paid the remaining amount and failed to cooperate in the construction's completion.
The final verdict favored the appellant, with the Adjudicating Officer directing Fame Developers to repay the principal amount along with interest and compensation for mental distress and other expenses. This case represents a significant red flag for the builder's reliability and adherence to contractual obligations.
Based on the available data, Fame Developers has a concerning track record, having lost the only legal case filed against them. This suggests issues with project completion and customer satisfaction. Potential buyers should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence before entering into agreements with this builder.
By following these guidelines, buyers can make informed decisions and better protect their investments.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Fame Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes over Payment and Cooperation.
In the case of Delayed Possession Claims, the applicant contended that despite receiving full payment, the builder failed to complete the construction on schedule and did not provide possession of the plot. This is a common theme in real estate disputes, where buyers often find themselves in a precarious situation, having made payments without receiving the promised property.
The second theme, Disputes over Payment and Cooperation, highlights the builder's counter claim. The builder argued that the applicant did not pay the remaining amount owed and failed to cooperate in the completion of the construction. This indicates a communication breakdown between the parties involved, a frequent issue in construction projects where misunderstandings can lead to delays and litigation.
The underlying reasons for these disputes are varied. Common triggers for litigation include contesting penalties for delays, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over payment amounts and timelines. In the case of Fame Developers, the builder's failure to fulfill their commitments appears to be a central factor in the disputes reaching courtroom levels.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to honor agreements and provide timely possession of properties. The Adjudicating Officer ruled in favor of the applicant, requiring the builder to repay the principal amount along with interest and compensation for mental distress and other incurred expenses. This verdict emphasizes the legal obligations of builders to meet deadlines and fulfill contractual agreements, and it serves as a warning to buyers to be vigilant when engaging with builders with a history of such disputes.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!