CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the competitive world of real estate, the reputation of builders plays a critical role in the decision-making process for potential buyers. FORTUNE INFRA, a builder based in Rajasthan, has garnered attention due to its legal track record and customer satisfaction metrics. This blog post delves into the performance of FORTUNE INFRA in terms of complaints and legal cases, offering insights for prospective homebuyers.
Currently, FORTUNE INFRA has recorded a total of 1 complaint. While this figure may initially seem minimal, it is essential to analyze the circumstances surrounding this complaint to assess the builder's reliability.
FORTUNE INFRA has faced 1 legal case, which resulted in a win for the builder. Below are the details of the case:
This legal victory indicates that FORTUNE INFRA successfully met the obligations required to validate their project status, showcasing a commitment to compliance.
Overall, FORTUNE INFRA presents a mixed yet promising reputation within the construction landscape of Rajasthan. With one complaint to their name but a clean track record when it comes to legal battles, potential buyers may find comfort in the builder's ability to fulfill legal obligations.
By considering these insights and actions, potential buyers can make informed decisions that align with their needs and expectations when selecting a builder like FORTUNE INFRA.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, FORTUNE INFRA, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases primarily revolved around themes of non-compliance with municipal orders and disputes regarding completion and occupancy certificates.
In particular, one notable case highlighted the appellant's claim that the builder failed to submit a completion certificate and did not apply for an extension of the project.
However, the builder effectively defended itself by stating that both a completion certificate and an occupancy certificate had been issued within the appropriate time frames.
The case concluded with the discharge of notices against the promoter, underscoring the builder’s compliance with legal obligations.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court often included claims of delays in project completion, allegations of non-compliance with construction regulations, or disputes about occupancy and completion certifications. Often, buyers or regulatory bodies felt compelled to take legal action due to perceived failures by the builder. This indicates a broader pattern wherein certain disputes arise from miscommunications or misunderstandings about project timelines and regulatory frameworks.
The builder's success in these cases can largely be attributed to the opposing parties presenting insufficient evidence or failing to adhere to legal and regulatory norms. This is particularly evident when buyers or other parties might exaggerate claims or misunderstand the complexity of real estate regulations. Furthermore, the builder was able to navigate the legal landscape competently and comply with all necessary municipal requirements, demonstrating its commitment to fulfilling obligations.
This analysis sheds light on FORTUNE INFRA's reputation within the real estate sector. The ability to successfully defend against claims not only speaks to the builder’s operational integrity but also highlights the pitfalls potential buyers may face in the market. False allegations against builders can lead to lengthy legal disputes, underscoring the importance of discerning legitimate complaints from spurious ones.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to approach claims and accusations with caution. While there are genuine disputes within the real estate landscape, the analysis of cases against builders like FORTUNE INFRA reveals that they can often defend themselves against unfounded claims. It is crucial for buyers to conduct thorough due diligence and seek reliable information before forming opinions on a builder's credibility.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F 3(२९५)RJ/RERA/PI2… | Rajasthan | The case was disposed by discharging notices issu… | ["Discharge of noti… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Suo Moto through Re… | Fortune Infra | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/7823F.3(295).pdf |