| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the world of real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount for ensuring a smooth home-buying experience. In this post, we will delve into the track record of G K Builders, a company operating primarily in Rajasthan. We will analyze their legal standing through the lens of complaints and court cases to provide you with an informed perspective.
Overview of G K Builders
G K Builders operates in Rajasthan and has a minimal track record in legal disputes. They have one recorded complaint against them and, to date, have lost one case, which provides important insight into their operational integrity and customer dealings.
Legal Cases Overview
The builder has encountered one legal dispute:
- Cases Lost: 1
- Response to Claim: The respondent (in this case, G K Builders) maintained that the actual value of the project was Rs. 12 crore, arguing for a lenient view.
- Final Verdict: The court imposed a nominal penalty of Rs. 20,000 on G K Builders, indicating that while they did not win, the penalty was minor.
Analysis of Cases
Patterns in Lost Cases
G K Builders lost a single case. The primary takeaway here is the nature of the claims and the court's leniency in the verdict. Losing a case but receiving only a nominal penalty could suggest that while the builders' practices are not flawless, they may not be egregiously detrimental to clients or stakeholders. This implies either minor oversight or disagreements rather than serious breaches of contract or trust.
Patterns in Won Cases
Interestingly, G K Builders has not won any cases to date, suggesting that, at least in the arena of legal disputes, the builder has been unable to successfully challenge claims made against them. This could raise flags for potential buyers when evaluating their reliability, as a winning record can sometimes correlate with customer satisfaction and ethical business practices.
Overall Assessment
G K Builders has a minimal yet notable legal presence in their operations. The solitary complaint and the loss of one case coupled with a nominal penalty indicate that there may be areas for improvement in their customer relations and contractual obligations. However, the lack of multiple complaints or a history of severe legal issues could indicate a relatively stable operation in the context of the local real estate market.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Given the single complaint against G K Builders, it’s prudent for potential buyers to investigate further. Look into customer reviews and testimonials outside of legal disputes.
- Get Everything in Writing: As with any builder, ensure that all agreements and promises are documented clearly in the contract.
- Consult Legal Advice: Before signing any contracts, especially given G K Builders’ history, consider consulting with a legal expert to understand all implications.
- Visit Previous Projects: If possible, view the builder’s previous projects to assess quality and craftsmanship.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Reviews: Always seek out reviews from previous clients to gauge overall satisfaction.
- Examine Legal History: Investigate any legal issues related to the builder and understand the outcomes.
- Understand Financial Stability: Ensure the builder has solid financial backing or creditworthiness to avoid potential project delays.
- Look for Transparency: A good builder should be willing to provide detailed information about their projects and contractual terms without hesitation.
Conclusion
While G K Builders operates within the Rajasthan real estate market with a relatively low complaint history, their single court loss calls for caution among potential buyers. Engaging with them requires careful consideration and due diligence. By following the tips outlined in this blog, buyers can safeguard their interests while navigating the complexities of real estate transactions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against G K Builders, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two types: Project Valuation Disputes and Penalties for Project Delays.
In terms of Project Valuation Disputes, the builder faced claims that contested the actual value of their projects. For instance, in one significant case, the respondent argued that the project's true value was Rs. 12 crore, demonstrating a substantial discrepancy in valuation that could impact the builder's obligations and commitments. Such disputes often arise from varying methodologies used to determine project values or from claims of misinformation provided during the sale process.
The second theme, Penalties for Project Delays, is exemplified by the imposition of a nominal penalty of Rs. 20,000 on the builder in the case mentioned. While the specific reasons for the delay were not detailed in the summary, it is common for builders to face penalties due to insufficient progress on projects, which can be caused by numerous factors, including financial difficulties, regulatory issues, or unforeseen circumstances.
A pattern emerges from these summaries indicating that people commonly bring cases against builders when they feel that project values have been misrepresented or when delays have caused loss or inconvenience. The builder’s litigation often revolves around contesting these penalties, disputing project delay attributions, or arguing over the correct classification of projects—which suggests a systemic issue with communication or operational practices within the company.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to a lenient view taken by the courts, which suggests that while the builder's actions may not have been in compliance with expectations, they were not egregious enough to warrant severe penalties. However, the losses still highlight potential deficiencies in adhering to project valuation standards and timelines, which could impact their reputation and reliability in the market.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F.1६(२३)RAJIRERAIGe… | Rajasthan | The respondent, a real estate promoter, was found… | ["Real Estate", "Un… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The … | G K Builders | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/5202F.16(23)-.pdf |