builder logo

GALAXY DEVELOPERS

  • No of Complaints: 7
  • States (Active in): Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Kerala, Punjab
CIN Not Available
Year Established Not Available
Address Not Available
Company Status Not Available

Introduction

When it comes to property investment, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your experience as a buyer. Galaxy Developers operates in several states, including Kerala, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, and Punjab. However, a closer examination reveals a troubling track record in legal disputes that potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.

Legal Issues Faced by Galaxy Developers

Galaxy Developers has encountered seven complaints, leading to zero victories in court. This alarming statistic raises serious questions about the builder's operational integrity and reliability.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Common Factors in Lost Cases
  1. Failure to Provide Documentation: One recurring issue involves the builder's failure to submit necessary documentation for project registration.
  2. Delayed Completion and Possession: Multiple cases reported delays in handing over possession to buyers, often attributed to payment issues or unforeseen circumstances.
  3. Lack of Basic Facilities: Buyers frequently complained about the lack of basic infrastructure, such as electricity, in the projects, which seems to stem from a lack of accountability from the builder in relation to contractors.
  4. Ex-Parte Proceedings: In one case, the builder did not appear in court, leading to a default judgment against them, suggesting a lack of engagement in resolving disputes.
Common Factors in Cases Won
  1. Blame on Buyers for Delays: In cases where the builder defended against claims of delayed possession, they often countered by indicating that buyers had failed to make timely payments.
  2. Partnership Issues: They claimed to have partnered with another construction firm, which complicates their liability in some of the complaints.
  3. Court Directives for Completion: Most outcomes in their favor led to directions from authorities rather than outright wins, indicating an ongoing struggle to fully comply with contractual obligations.

Overall Assessment of Galaxy Developers

Given the data, Galaxy Developers appears to have a troubling history with customer satisfaction, as reflected in their zero wins in litigation against seven losses. Buyers should exercise caution, as the pattern of legal disputes signals potential long-term issues with project management and customer service.

Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Galaxy Developers

  1. Do Thorough Research: Prioritize researching any builder's past projects and legal history before making a commitment.
  2. Ask Current Residents: Speak to those living in properties developed by Galaxy Developers to gain insight into their experiences regarding delays and customer service.
  3. Scrutinize Contracts: Pay attention to the fine print in contracts to ensure that commitments related to completion dates and facilities are clearly laid out and enforceable.
  4. Prioritize Transparency: Engage with builders who are open about their processes and willing to share documentation regarding project registration and completion timelines.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  1. Review Their Reputation: Look for builders with a proven track record of successful project completions and happy customers.
  2. Verify Licenses and Compliance: Ensure that the builder adheres to local laws and building regulations.
  3. Seek Recommendations: Get referrals from family and friends to find trustworthy builders who come highly recommended.
  4. Assess Quality Over Price: Don't just go for the cheapest option; consider the quality of work, materials used, and after-sales service.

Conclusion

Investing in property is not just about the physical structures but also the trustworthiness of the builders behind them. Galaxy Developers presents a cautionary tale of the potential risks involved when dealing with builders who have unresolved legal issues. Prospective buyers must be vigilant, prioritize thorough research, and remain informed when it comes to making such significant financial decisions.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Provide Basic Facilities Non-Compliance with Registration Requirements Refund and Compensation Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Galaxy Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the challenges faced by their clients. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, highlighting essential issues that prospective buyers should consider.

The first theme, Delayed Possession Claims, encompasses a substantial number of cases. In these instances, the complainants primarily sought timely possession of their apartments and compensation for the delays. For example, in one case, the authority directed Galaxy Developers to complete pending works and pay interest at the rate of 17% per annum to the complainant. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of delayed payment from buyers, which they asserted caused the delays. However, the verdicts consistently favored the complainants, indicating a pattern where the builder was held accountable for delays despite their defenses.

The Failure to Provide Basic Facilities theme highlights another crucial aspect of Galaxy Developers' projects. In several cases, buyers complained about the lack of basic amenities, particularly electricity, in projects like 'Park Green Vista.' The builder's response typically pointed to other companies involved in the development, such as G.K. Construction Company, which they claimed were responsible for providing these facilities. Nonetheless, the authority ruled against Galaxy Developers, mandating them to ensure proper provisioning of essential services within specified timelines.

Non-Compliance with Registration Requirements stands out as a significant theme in the cases against Galaxy Developers. One notable instance involved the builder's failure to submit mandatory documents for project registration, leading to the rejection of their application and the confiscation of the registration fee. This highlights a troubling trend where the builder did not adhere to critical regulatory requirements, which could have implications for the legality and viability of their projects.

Lastly, the Refund and Compensation Disputes theme illustrates the depth of dissatisfaction among some buyers. In one case, a complainant sought a refund of Rs. 11,80,000/- along with interest, compensation for mental agony, and litigation expenses. The builder's lack of participation in the proceedings resulted in an expedited decision against them, underscoring the risks buyers may face when engaging with a builder who may not fulfill their obligations.

Common reasons for the losses in these cases include insufficient evidence from the builder to support their claims, non-compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks, and a recurring failure to meet project timelines and fulfill promised amenities. Buyers should take these patterns seriously and conduct thorough research on Galaxy Developers' reputation, past projects, and regulatory adherence before making any investment.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
Complaint AdCNo.136… Punjab The complainant, Sangeeta Pandit, filed a complai… ["Refund", "Interes… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed refu… Sangeeta Pandit Galaxy Developers https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgementsByAO\2021\/20210416OJbyAO40b58418-809f-4189-b048-e14342142198.pdf
129/2021 Kerala The complainant, Muhammad Valiya Mundok, filed a … ["Delay in completi… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… Muhammad Valiya Mun… Galaxy Developers https://rera.kerala.gov.in/complaint-file/129/2021/Muhamed Valiya Mundok
149/2022 Kerala The complainant, Ranjit N Pillai, filed a complai… ["Delay in completi… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… Ranjit N Pillai Galaxy Developers https://rera.kerala.gov.in/complaint-file/149/2022/Ranjit N. Pillai
CMP/Ahmedabad/18061… Gujarat Complaint withdrawn by the complainant. Case disp… Complaint withdrawal {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… Rakesh N Dave Galaxy Developers https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ftEWIK2gibU8Z_7KRqUbZ3aIxMlmJSUX
229 551-?A200-202-0… Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh RERA rejected the application for re… ["Non-submission of… {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… Chhattisgarh RERA Galaxy Developers https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_SM-PRO-2021-01488/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_fc77ec9d-0844-43d7-b4ce-4ce834aad55f.pdf

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins