CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When it comes to property investment, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your experience as a buyer. Galaxy Developers operates in several states, including Kerala, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, and Punjab. However, a closer examination reveals a troubling track record in legal disputes that potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.
Galaxy Developers has encountered seven complaints, leading to zero victories in court. This alarming statistic raises serious questions about the builder's operational integrity and reliability.
Given the data, Galaxy Developers appears to have a troubling history with customer satisfaction, as reflected in their zero wins in litigation against seven losses. Buyers should exercise caution, as the pattern of legal disputes signals potential long-term issues with project management and customer service.
Investing in property is not just about the physical structures but also the trustworthiness of the builders behind them. Galaxy Developers presents a cautionary tale of the potential risks involved when dealing with builders who have unresolved legal issues. Prospective buyers must be vigilant, prioritize thorough research, and remain informed when it comes to making such significant financial decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Galaxy Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the challenges faced by their clients. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, highlighting essential issues that prospective buyers should consider.
The first theme, Delayed Possession Claims, encompasses a substantial number of cases. In these instances, the complainants primarily sought timely possession of their apartments and compensation for the delays. For example, in one case, the authority directed Galaxy Developers to complete pending works and pay interest at the rate of 17% per annum to the complainant. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of delayed payment from buyers, which they asserted caused the delays. However, the verdicts consistently favored the complainants, indicating a pattern where the builder was held accountable for delays despite their defenses.
The Failure to Provide Basic Facilities theme highlights another crucial aspect of Galaxy Developers' projects. In several cases, buyers complained about the lack of basic amenities, particularly electricity, in projects like 'Park Green Vista.' The builder's response typically pointed to other companies involved in the development, such as G.K. Construction Company, which they claimed were responsible for providing these facilities. Nonetheless, the authority ruled against Galaxy Developers, mandating them to ensure proper provisioning of essential services within specified timelines.
Non-Compliance with Registration Requirements stands out as a significant theme in the cases against Galaxy Developers. One notable instance involved the builder's failure to submit mandatory documents for project registration, leading to the rejection of their application and the confiscation of the registration fee. This highlights a troubling trend where the builder did not adhere to critical regulatory requirements, which could have implications for the legality and viability of their projects.
Lastly, the Refund and Compensation Disputes theme illustrates the depth of dissatisfaction among some buyers. In one case, a complainant sought a refund of Rs. 11,80,000/- along with interest, compensation for mental agony, and litigation expenses. The builder's lack of participation in the proceedings resulted in an expedited decision against them, underscoring the risks buyers may face when engaging with a builder who may not fulfill their obligations.
Common reasons for the losses in these cases include insufficient evidence from the builder to support their claims, non-compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks, and a recurring failure to meet project timelines and fulfill promised amenities. Buyers should take these patterns seriously and conduct thorough research on Galaxy Developers' reputation, past projects, and regulatory adherence before making any investment.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complaint AdCNo.136… | Punjab | The complainant, Sangeeta Pandit, filed a complai… | ["Refund", "Interes… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed refu… | Sangeeta Pandit | Galaxy Developers | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgementsByAO\2021\/20210416OJbyAO40b58418-809f-4189-b048-e14342142198.pdf |
129/2021 | Kerala | The complainant, Muhammad Valiya Mundok, filed a … | ["Delay in completi… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Muhammad Valiya Mun… | Galaxy Developers | https://rera.kerala.gov.in/complaint-file/129/2021/Muhamed Valiya Mundok |
149/2022 | Kerala | The complainant, Ranjit N Pillai, filed a complai… | ["Delay in completi… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Ranjit N Pillai | Galaxy Developers | https://rera.kerala.gov.in/complaint-file/149/2022/Ranjit N. Pillai |
CMP/Ahmedabad/18061… | Gujarat | Complaint withdrawn by the complainant. Case disp… | Complaint withdrawal | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Rakesh N Dave | Galaxy Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ftEWIK2gibU8Z_7KRqUbZ3aIxMlmJSUX |
229 551-?A200-202-0… | Chhattisgarh | Chhattisgarh RERA rejected the application for re… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Chhattisgarh RERA | Galaxy Developers | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_SM-PRO-2021-01488/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_fc77ec9d-0844-43d7-b4ce-4ce834aad55f.pdf |