GALAXY DEVELOPERS logo

GALAXY DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (7 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Kerala, Punjab
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When it comes to property investment, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your experience as a buyer. Galaxy Developers operates in several states, including Kerala, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, and Punjab. However, a closer examination reveals a troubling track record in legal disputes that potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.

Legal Issues Faced by Galaxy Developers

Galaxy Developers has encountered seven complaints, leading to zero victories in court. This alarming statistic raises serious questions about the builder's operational integrity and reliability.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Common Factors in Lost Cases
  1. Failure to Provide Documentation: One recurring issue involves the builder's failure to submit necessary documentation for project registration.
  2. Delayed Completion and Possession: Multiple cases reported delays in handing over possession to buyers, often attributed to payment issues or unforeseen circumstances.
  3. Lack of Basic Facilities: Buyers frequently complained about the lack of basic infrastructure, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Provide Basic Facilities Non-Compliance with Registration Requirements Refund and Compensation Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Galaxy Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the challenges faced by their clients. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, highlighting essential issues that prospective buyers should consider.

The first theme, Delayed Possession Claims, encompasses a substantial number of cases. In these instances, the complainants primarily sought timely possession of their apartments and compensation for the delays. For example, in one case, the authority directed Galaxy Developers to complete pending works and pay interest at the rate of 17% per annum to the complainant. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of delayed payment from buyers, which they asserted caused the delays. However, the verdicts consistently favored the complainants, indicating a pattern where the builder was held accountable for delays despite their defenses.

The Failure to Provide Basic Facilities theme highlights another crucial aspect …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review