GANPATI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
- States Active In: Uttar Pradesh
| CIN | U70102UP2012PLC049767 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | GANESH PLAZA, 1ST FLOOR 31/472, C/1, SULTANGANJ BYE PASS ROAD AGRA UP 282004 IN |
| Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
GANPATI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED is a builder operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh, India. A thorough examination of its legal history reveals key insights into its operations and buyer experiences. In this blog post, we'll delve into the builder's complaint record, analyze the outcomes of its legal battles, and provide essential tips for potential buyers.
Legal Overview
Complaint Analysis
GANPATI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED has faced a total of 2 complaints. In contrast to the number of complaints, the builder has not won any cases, indicating a potentially concerning trend regarding its dealings and customer satisfaction.
Summary of Legal Cases
Cases Won: 0
- Actions Taken: The builder faced two cases and lost both. Unfortunately, without details on these cases, it is difficult to identify precise factors that may have contributed to these losses. However, the absence of any successful defenses suggests a troubling pattern concerning contractual obligations or service …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Ganpati Infrastructure Development Company Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes. The cases highlight two primary topics: Delayed Possession Claims and the need for Condonation of Delay, indicating that many of the disputes revolved around project delays and the builder's inability to meet timelines. Additionally, there is a recurring theme related to Document Compliance, which suggests that the builder faced challenges related to maintaining appropriate documentation or adhering to legal requirements in their dealings.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court primarily involve the builder's attempts to seek condonation for delays caused by unforeseen circumstances. In each instance, the builder claimed that the delay in filing appeals was due to circumstances beyond their control, and they sought to justify these delays rather than contest penalties or project delays directly attributed to their actions. This indicates …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!