GANPATI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 2
- States (Active in): Uttar Pradesh
| CIN | U70102UP2012PLC049767 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 9-Apr-12 |
| Address | GANESH PLAZA, 1ST FLOOR 31/472, C/1, SULTANGANJ BYE PASS ROAD AGRA UP 282004 IN |
| Company Status | Public |
Introduction
GANPATI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED is a builder operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh, India. A thorough examination of its legal history reveals key insights into its operations and buyer experiences. In this blog post, we'll delve into the builder's complaint record, analyze the outcomes of its legal battles, and provide essential tips for potential buyers.
Legal Overview
Complaint Analysis
GANPATI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED has faced a total of 2 complaints. In contrast to the number of complaints, the builder has not won any cases, indicating a potentially concerning trend regarding its dealings and customer satisfaction.
Summary of Legal Cases
Cases Won: 0
- Actions Taken: The builder faced two cases and lost both. Unfortunately, without details on these cases, it is difficult to identify precise factors that may have contributed to these losses. However, the absence of any successful defenses suggests a troubling pattern concerning contractual obligations or service delivery issues.
Cases Lost: 2
- Common Factors: Since both cases resulted in losses for the builder, it may imply recurring issues such as:
- Lack of timely project completion or adherence to contracts.
- Insufficient responses to client grievances.
Cases filed against the builder
Interestingly, while the cases were termed as won in the summary, the outcomes suggest a focus on procedural matters rather than favoring the builder substantively. The tribunal has allowed procedural motions related to the appeal processes but did not ultimately favor the builder's stance.
Buyer Guidance
Tips for Potential Buyers Considering GANPATI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED
- Conduct Thorough Research: Buyers should investigate the builder’s past projects, current timelines, and community feedback before proceeding.
- Request Detailed Contracts: Ensure every clause is understood, particularly concerning completion dates and quality standards.
- Seek Independent Reviews: Look for testimonials from previous buyers or third-party evaluations of the builder’s reliability and quality.
- Consider Legal Protections: It may be wise to engage legal counsel when entering into agreements with this builder to safeguard your interests.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check for Licensing and Certifications: Valid licenses signify a legitimate operation.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is less likely to face project disruptions.
- Verify Project History: Inspect past projects for quality and timeliness.
- Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with local real estate laws to ensure compliance.
Conclusion
GANPATI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED has encountered challenges in its dealings, as underscored by its legal performance. With no cases won against two legal complaints, potential buyers should proceed with caution when considering purchases from this builder. Armed with the right information and precautions, buyers can make informed decisions in the real estate market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Ganpati Infrastructure Development Company Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes. The cases highlight two primary topics: Delayed Possession Claims and the need for Condonation of Delay, indicating that many of the disputes revolved around project delays and the builder's inability to meet timelines. Additionally, there is a recurring theme related to Document Compliance, which suggests that the builder faced challenges related to maintaining appropriate documentation or adhering to legal requirements in their dealings.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court primarily involve the builder's attempts to seek condonation for delays caused by unforeseen circumstances. In each instance, the builder claimed that the delay in filing appeals was due to circumstances beyond their control, and they sought to justify these delays rather than contest penalties or project delays directly attributed to their actions. This indicates a pattern where the builder’s litigation was often reactive, seeking to mitigate consequences rather than resolve project-related disputes outright.
The common factor in the builder's losses in these cases appears to be related to compliance and documentation issues rather than the inherent merit of their claims. The tribunal's decision to direct the builder to place certain documents on record after granting condonation highlights the importance of legal compliance and proper documentation in these matters. It suggests that while the builder's claims may have had merit, their failure to adhere to required legal and regulatory standards ultimately led to the outcomes unfavorable to them.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.