| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
Global Constructions has made a name for itself as a builder in Gujarat, with a small but notable record of legal engagements. In this post, we delve into the builder's track record based on legal complaints, outcomes of cases, and insights for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Cases
Global Constructions has faced a total of three complaints, which were all resolved in favor of the builder. An analysis of these cases reveals critical insights into their operational practices and legal standing.
Legal Case Details
The cases filed against Global Constructions involved similar themes:
- Nature of Complaints: All three complaints centered on the claim that the builder did not obtain the necessary Building Use (BU) permission and failed to register with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) for their project, Ajba Residency. Additionally, the complainants expressed concerns regarding poor construction quality and the need for substantial structural changes.
- Builder's Defense: The builder contended that the project was completed before the RERA Act became applicable in 2015-16, arguing that the complainants had sold their flats and thus lacked the standing to initiate the complaints.
- Verdict Outcomes: Each of the three complaints was dismissed. The courts found that the complaints were filed jointly by the owners of three flats with vague details and insufficient evidence to support their claims.
Patterns and Analysis
- Common Factors in Lost Cases：
- Vague and Joint Complaints: The cases appeared to suffer from a lack of specificity. The joint filing with ambiguous details weakened the case against Global Constructions.
- Timing and Applicability Issues: The defense raised pertinent points regarding the completion of the project and the timing of the complaints in relation to applicable laws.
- Common Factors in Won Cases：
- Strong Defense: Global Constructions’ successful defense hinged on the interpretation of the RERA Act and the timing of project completion, bolstered by the argument that the complainants no longer held rights over the properties they sold.
- Dismissal Due to Lack of Evidence: The court’s ruling, favoring the builder, highlighted the importance of concrete evidence in legal disputes regarding property construction.
Conclusion
Overall, Global Constructions showcases a robust legal standing, having won all of its cases in court. The primary allegations against the builder revolved around procedural compliance concerning RERA, which ultimately did not hold up in court due to the lack of precise evidence and the historical context of the project's completion.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Ensure you understand the builder's compliance with local regulations and check their history with RERA or similar authorities.
- Documentation: When dealing with a builder, always secure detailed documentation of agreements and construction standards to protect your interests.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Look for Reviews and Ratings: Check previous customer reviews and ratings for insights on the builder’s quality and reliability.
- Verify Legal Standing: Ensure the builder has a clean legal track record without significant unresolved complaints.
- Inspect Previous Projects: If possible, visit completed projects by the builder to assess construction quality firsthand.
In conclusion, while Global Constructions has faced complaints, their proven track record of winning cases establishes them as a formidable builder in the Gujarat real estate market. Buyers should remain vigilant and well-informed to make the best purchasing decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Global Constructions, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The primary disputes can be categorized into a few recurring themes:
- Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements:
A significant number of complaints from buyers centered on the builder's alleged failure to obtain Building Use (BU) permission and the necessary registration under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). Buyers argued that these oversights not only violated regulations but also materially impacted the legitimacy of the project.
- Claims of Poor Construction Quality:
Many complainants claimed that the construction quality was substandard and that significant structural changes were necessary. Such assertions often lead to heightened buyer concerns over safety and investment value.
- Ownership and Right to Complain:
A common thread in many cases was disputes regarding the right of complainants to file grievances, especially after they had sold their flats. The question arose whether previous owners retained the authority to challenge the builder, given that they no longer had a stake in the property.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court were predominantly linked to contesting the builder's adherence to legal standards and alleging shortcomings in construction quality. Many buyers were motivated by recent experiences that left them dissatisfied or worried about their investments.
The builder emerged victorious in these disputes primarily due to the opposing parties' failure to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims. The dismissals often highlighted vague details in the complaints, indicating a lack of thorough preparation by the complainants. Furthermore, the builder successfully argued that many of these complaints were moot because the projects were completed before RERA's enactment, which further solidified the defense's position.
This analysis reflects positively on Global Constructions' reputation in the real estate market. It underscores that while buyers can sometimes raise serious concerns, they may also file false or exaggerated claims. The builder's ability to defend itself effectively suggests a solid adherence to construction standards and compliance with regulatory requirements.
For potential buyers, this serves as an important reminder of the necessity to base decisions on thorough research and credible information. While legitimate concerns do exist within the real estate sector, the outcomes of these cases indicate that builders like Global Constructions can successfully counter unfounded claims. Buyers are advised to approach allegations against builders with caution and always seek comprehensive evidence before forming judgments about a builder's reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/A/Online/Ahmeda… | Gujarat | Complaint against Samawala for not obtaining BU p… | ["RERA", "BU permis… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha… | Wasim Khan Bashir K… | Global Constructions | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1rehk5SEHZyr0zDVpzn71wHZo3gNhnUOp |