| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to real estate investment, choosing the right builder is paramount to ensuring a smooth journey towards owning your dream property. In this blog post, we will analyze one particular builder, GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE, based on their legal history and consumer feedback. This detailed examination will help potential buyers make informed decisions.
Company Overview
Builder Name: GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE
States with Projects: Gujarat
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
Legal Case Details
The legal landscape surrounding a builder can provide critical insights into their operational integrity. For GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE, there is one significant case worth exploring:
- Appellant Claim: The appellant accused Global Infrastructure of violating Section-11(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act-2016. The claim specifically pointed out that the builder did not mention the RERA registration number and website in their advertisement.
Respondent Claim: The builder defended their actions by asserting that the …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Global Infrastructure, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: regulatory non-compliance and penalties for violations.
The first type of cases involves regulatory non-compliance, particularly in relation to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act-2016 (RERA). In one notable case, the builder was fined for failing to mention the required RERA registration number and website in an advertisement. This highlights a pattern where builders may not fully adhere to the regulatory requirements, leading to legal consequences.
The reasons people commonly bring cases to court against this builder include contesting what they perceive as violations of RERA and other regulatory frameworks. In the case above, the mistake was deemed more than an inadvertent error, leading to a financial penalty. This shows that regulators and consumers are increasingly vigilant about compliance …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!