GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP logo

GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP

3.9/5 (13 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Delhi, National Capital Territory Of Delhi, Nct Of Delhi, Nct Of Delhi & Ut Of Chandigarh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressGodrej One, 5th Floor, Pirojshanagar, Eastern Express Highway, Vikhroli (East) , Mumbai Mumbai Maharashtra 400079
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When investing in real estate, buyers often delve into the reputation and reliability of builders. One such builder, GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP, is noteworthy due to its legal history that has raised concerns among potential buyers. This blog post takes a closer look at the builder's track record based on case data, offering insights that can aid in making informed purchasing decisions.

Legal Case Overview

GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP has faced a total of 13 complaints, with only 1 case won and 12 cases lost. Notably, the builder operates primarily in the regions of Delhi, NCT of Delhi & UT of Chandigarh, and the National Capital Territory of Delhi. A detailed examination of the cases provides a clearer picture of the common issues encountered by buyers and the builder’s responses.

Analysis of Cases Lost

The cases lost by GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP reveal several recurring themes:

  1. Refund Disputes: A significant number of …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Refund Claims Due to Unforeseen Circumstances Disputes Over Sale Consideration and Contractual Obligations Changes in Layout and Building Plans Without Consent

Analysis of the cases filed against Godrej Vestamark LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key issues in their disputes with clients. The cases highlight a range of concerns primarily revolving around financial disputes related to refunds, the acceptance of sale considerations, and the builder's obligations regarding project changes.

The first common theme among the cases is the claim for refunds due to unforeseen circumstances. In multiple instances, buyers sought to recover their investments when they encountered situations that prevented them from proceeding with the purchase. The builder, however, often contested these claims by invoking the terms of the application form, which they believed entitled them to forfeit the amounts paid. The authority consistently ruled in favor of the buyers, indicating a legal expectation that builders should be more accommodating in exceptional circumstances.

The second theme involves disputes over the total sale consideration and the contractual obligations …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Refund Disputes Voluntary Cancellation Claims Lack of Formal Agreements Litigation for Non-Compliance Appeal Dismissals

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP, which it lost, reveals several insights into the nature of disputes commonly faced by this builder.

Refund Disputes

A recurring theme in the cases is the issue of refunds. In multiple instances, the builder contested claims made by respondents seeking refunds of amounts paid. The builder argued that the respondents were not entitled to these refunds; however, verdicts consistently favored the respondents, with courts affirming the need for the builder to return the funds. This situation often arose due to changes in project plans or financial difficulties faced by the respondents, ultimately compelling the builder to concede.

Voluntary Cancellation Claims

Another frequent dispute involved claims surrounding voluntary cancellations. The builder often asserted that respondents canceled their bookings willingly, thus entitling them to retain the booking amount. Yet, in both cases summarized, the builder was unable to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Extension of Time for Deposits Disputes over Compliance with Legal Requirements

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, GODREJ VESTAMARK LLP, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily center around two recurring themes: 'Extension of Time for Deposits' and 'Disputes over Compliance with Legal Requirements'.

In terms of 'Extension of Time for Deposits', the builder brought forth cases seeking more time to make necessary financial deposits under different provisions of the law. These commonly arose due to various factors, including procedural delays or unanticipated circumstances impacting the builder's operations. The cases indicate a pattern where timely compliance is sought but can be hindered by external situations.

Regarding 'Disputes over Compliance with Legal Requirements', this category reflects the builder's legal efforts to contest penalties and unfounded claims related to regulatory issues. These disputes often arise when parties impose penalties or accusations that the builder believes to be exaggerated or misplaced.

One …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review