CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive landscape of real estate development in Karnataka, prospective buyers have a plethora of options. One such builder that has garnered attention is GREEN EARTH VENTURE. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's complaint history, legal battles, and overall reputation to help prospective homeowners make informed decisions.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Green Earth Venture, which it lost, revealed significant issues concerning the adherence to contractual obligations and regulatory compliance, particularly regarding the provision of essential amenities and water connections.
The cases highlight two recurring themes: the failure to provide agreed-upon amenities and non-compliance with BWSSB/KSPCB and STP connections. In each instance, the complainants asserted that they were charged for services and amenities that were never delivered. These undelivered amenities include generators meant for powering common areas, lifts, and pump rooms, which are critical for the proper functioning of residential complexes. Moreover, the builder failed to establish the required water connections, leaving residents without access to assured water supply and STP facilities as mandated by regulatory bodies.
A pattern emerges from these cases: the primary trigger for litigation was the builder’s failure to fulfill significant contractual commitments. Residents did not contest penalties or dispute delays attributed to other parties; rather, they focused on the tangible absence of promised amenities and connections that affected their quality of life. This highlights a concerning level of negligence on the part of the builder, as these amenities are fundamental to home ownership and were unequivocally agreed upon in the sale agreements.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their lack of defense. In each instance, the builder failed to file a statement of objection, produce supporting documents, or contest the claims made by the complainants. This absence of evidence or reasoning to justify their actions resulted in the authority ruling against them, mandating the provision of the required connections and amenities within a specified timeline.
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to exercise diligence when engaging with builders. It is crucial to not only carefully review the terms of sale and ensure that all promised amenities are clearly stipulated but also to assess the builder's track record regarding legal complaints and regulatory adherence. Buyers should be wary of builders with a history of such issues, as this may indicate a systematic problem with their operational practices.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!