GREEN SPACE INFRAHEIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Navigating the real estate market can be challenging, especially when it comes to builder reputation and reliability. In this blog post, we will delve into the legal history and customer grievances associated with Green Space Infraheights Private Limited, focusing on their performance in handling customer complaints and legal cases.

Company Overview

Green Space Infraheights Private Limited, which operates primarily in Haryana, has faced a substantial number of complaints—60 in total. Unfortunately, their track record in legal matters is concerning, having won only 2 cases compared to a staggering 58 losses. This outcome raises critical questions about the builder’s commitment to fulfilling its promises to customers regarding project delivery and customer service.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Won by the Builder

• Green Space Infraheights Private Limited managed to win 2 cases. Among these, they successfully appealed a penalty that was originally imposed due to their delays and were granted a reduction …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Green Space Infraheights Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, project completion delays, refund disputes, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on construction timelines.

The majority of the cases were filed by homebuyers who made substantial payments for flats that were meant to be completed within a stipulated timeline. However, the builder consistently failed to deliver possession of the flats, leading to multiple claims for refunds and damages. The builder's defense often cited unforeseen circumstances, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic, as a cause for delays; however, this defense did not stand in court as the authority determined that the builder had failed to complete projects and deliver units despite receiving full payment.

A pattern emerges from these case summaries: the builder’s inability …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information.

The builder Green Space Infraheights Private Limited found itself in litigation primarily revolving around a few recurring themes: penalties for project delays, disputes over claims of injustice related to penalties, and regulatory compliance issues.

The cases often involved the builder contesting penalties imposed by authorities, with the builder asserting that the penalties were unjustified or excessive due to various circumstances. The summary highlights that in some instances, the builder managed to win cases by demonstrating that the imposed penalties were unreasonable or disproportionate to the alleged infractions. Notably, no claims were filed by respondents in the instances analyzed, indicating a potential lack of substantial grievances or ineffective defenses against the builder's arguments.

Common triggers for the builder’s litigation include disagreements about the justifiability of penalties and disputes about compliance with project timelines. In some …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Green Space Infraheights Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed several insights regarding the disputes and verdicts. The cases primarily fall under common themes, including disputes over land conversion or classification, regulatory non-compliance, delayed possession claims, and penalties for project delays.

Each category showcases the nature of the disputes. For instance, disputes over land conversion often arise when parties contest the classification of the land or the builder’s right to develop property in a particular way. Regulatory non-compliance cases generally stem from buyers' claims that the builder did not adhere to local regulations or building codes. Delayed possession claims indicate that buyers expected possession of their properties within a certain timeframe but found themselves waiting longer than what was specified. Lastly, disputes related to penalties for project delays could emerge from clients asserting that penalties should have been levied on the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis