Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Grow Plus Infra, which it lost, reveals several key themes across the various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into common themes such as delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, penalties for project delays, and procedural delays and appeals.

The reasons people commonly brought cases to court against Grow Plus Infra primarily revolved around contesting delays in project completion, disputing penalties imposed for these delays, and disagreements over land classification or conversion that affected project delivery timelines. A pattern emerges where the builder faced litigation often due to misunderstandings of land or project classification rules and non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic which introduced additional layers of complexity.

The common reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases highlight the importance of adherence to legal standards and timelines. In many instances, Grow Plus Infra faced setbacks due to insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with interim directions from tribunals, or an inability to meet regulatory requirements that govern construction projects. The case that stood out involved an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, where the builder attributed the delay to factors beyond their control during the pandemic. Although the tribunal showed leniency in this case, the broader trend indicates a need for builders to ensure diligence in their operations and compliance practices to avoid similar legal challenges.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Grow Plus Infra, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around two common themes: 'Condonation of Delay Claims' and 'Amendment of Appeals'. These categories encapsulate the instances where the builder sought judicial relief to amend the appeal or condone delays in filing applications.

In the cases categorized under 'Condonation of Delay Claims', it was noted that Grow Plus Infra consistently sought to justify delays in their applications, with the opposing party often waiving notice and requesting additional time to respond. This indicates a proactive approach to rectify situations rather than simply contesting penalties or claims. On the other hand, the 'Amendment of Appeals' cases highlight the builder's intention to ensure that all relevant points were considered and addressed in the appeals process.

The reasons behind the builder bringing these cases to court generally include the necessity to amend an appeal for completeness or to condone delays which may arise due to unforeseen circumstances. Notably, the summaries do not depict any aggressive litigation regarding penalties or disputes of a more contentious nature commonly seen in construction-related lawsuits. Instead, they reflect a legal strategy focused on procedural compliance and due diligence.

Common reasons for Grow Plus Infra's court victories stem from the opposing parties’ waiver of notice and requests for time to respond, indicating a lack of contest to the builder's claims in court. This suggests insufficient evidence or possibly a failure on the part of the respondents to comply with legal expectations, which ultimately allowed the builder to assert its rights effectively. Additionally, the outcomes reveal that the builder was capable of defending itself against cases where claims appeared exaggerated or baseless. These factors collectively reinforce Grow Plus Infra’s ability to navigate the legal landscape efficiently.

This analysis also sheds light on the general reputation of Grow Plus Infra within the real estate market. It highlights an important reality: buyers can sometimes level unfounded allegations against builders, which may force them into legal disputes. However, the builder’s strong track record of successful defenses against unjust claims portrays a responsible and responsive construction process.

In conclusion, potential buyers should approach real estate investments with careful consideration. While legitimate disputes do occur in the sector, the specific context of cases involving builders like Grow Plus Infra suggests that they can often substantiate their positions in court and fend off unjust claims. Prospective buyers should conduct thorough research and gather credible information before making judgments about a builder's reputation, ensuring they make informed decisions in their property investments.