| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Overview of Grow Plus Infra
In the competitive real estate market of Maharashtra, Grow Plus Infra has established itself as a notable builder. With a mix of successes and challenges, analyzing their performance through legal cases provides an insight into their operations and reliability. This blog post delves into the builder's complaint history, legal victories, and what potential buyers should know.
Legal Performance
Grow Plus Infra has a total of 6 complaints lodged against it. Notably, the builder has emerged victorious in 5 cases, highlighting a strong legal standing in most disputes. However, they have lost 1 case, prompting a closer look at the patterns in their legal battles.
Winning Cases Breakdown
The cases won by Grow Plus Infra predominantly involve requests for condonation of delay—essentially applications to excuse late submissions in legal processes. These patterns present a few common themes:
- Condonation of Delay: Most winning cases revolved …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Grow Plus Infra, which it lost, reveals several key themes across the various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into common themes such as delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, penalties for project delays, and procedural delays and appeals.
The reasons people commonly brought cases to court against Grow Plus Infra primarily revolved around contesting delays in project completion, disputing penalties imposed for these delays, and disagreements over land classification or conversion that affected project delivery timelines. A pattern emerges where the builder faced litigation often due to misunderstandings of land or project classification rules and non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic which introduced additional layers of complexity.
The common reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases highlight the importance of adherence to legal standards and timelines. In …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Grow Plus Infra, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around two common themes: 'Condonation of Delay Claims' and 'Amendment of Appeals'. These categories encapsulate the instances where the builder sought judicial relief to amend the appeal or condone delays in filing applications.
In the cases categorized under 'Condonation of Delay Claims', it was noted that Grow Plus Infra consistently sought to justify delays in their applications, with the opposing party often waiving notice and requesting additional time to respond. This indicates a proactive approach to rectify situations rather than simply contesting penalties or claims. On the other hand, the 'Amendment of Appeals' cases highlight the builder's intention to ensure that all relevant points were considered and addressed in the appeals process.
The reasons behind the builder bringing these cases to court generally include the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from GROW PLUS INFRA?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.