HIMANSHU INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Madhya Pradesh
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, selecting the right builder is crucial for ensuring a satisfactory home-buying experience. One such builder is Himanshu Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., which has drawn attention due to its legal history and project footprints mainly located in Madhya Pradesh. In this blog post, we will analyze the performance of Himanshu Infrastructure based on the complaints filed against them and how they have handled legal challenges.
Overview of Legal Cases
Himanshu Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. has faced a total of 1 complaint, of which they lost this particular case. Here’s a brief summary of the case:- Case Filed Against Himanshu Infrastructure: The appellant claimed compensation for the delay in the possession of the flat and non-completion of construction. The builder contended that delays were due to unforeseen circumstances, asserting that they were not responsible for the non-completion。
- Final Verdict: The court ordered Himanshu Infrastructure to pay compensation at the rate of Rs. 4.50 and Rs. 5 per square foot per month for the super built-up area.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
- Common Factors: The single case lost by Himanshu Infrastructure involves important themes such as delay in possession and the completion of construction, which are critical issues for customers. The ruling suggests that the builder was found lacking in providing timely delivery and fulfilling contract commitments.
Cases Won
- Common Factors: Although there is a claim of cases won, the report only specifies one case where the builder lost. The details concerning other cases won are not available; thus, there is insufficient data to identify patterns in successful defenses or victories in court.
Conclusion
Himanshu Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. has had a rocky start with legal complaints that can be concerning for potential buyers. Currently, they have recorded 1 complaint leading to a lost case, raising questions about their commitment to timely delivery and meeting construction obligations.Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Before Committing: Thoroughly investigate the reputation of the builder. Look for customer reviews and any legal issues they may have encountered in the past.
- Evaluate Project Progress: Visit ongoing projects to assess the construction pace and quality of work.
- Ask for Clarity: Before signing a contract, ensure that all terms, especially related to timelines and completion guarantees, are clear.
- Compensation Clauses: Inquire about compensation for delays to protect your interests.
General Tips for Choosing a Builder
- Check Credentials: Ensure that the builder is registered and has the necessary licensing to operate.
- Financial Stability: Assess the builder’s financial health; this may indicate their ability to complete projects without hindrance.
- Transparency: A reputable builder should be transparent about costs, timelines, and any potential risks involved.
- Contractual Agreement: Only proceed with a builder who is willing to provide a detailed and legally binding contract.
Final Thoughts
Choosing a builder is a significant decision, and understanding their history can help you make an informed choice. While Himanshu Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. has faced setbacks, potential buyers should weigh these factors carefully against their future home needs.No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Himanshu Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., which the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key pieces of information across the board.
The cases against the builder primarily revolve around three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-Completion of Construction Disputes, and the builder's frequent reliance on the Unforeseen Circumstances Defense.
The Delayed Possession Claims involve the builder failing to deliver completed flats to buyers within the stipulated timeline. In these cases, buyers sought compensation for the delay in possession, which reflects a growing concern among buyers about builders' ability to meet project timelines.
Non-Completion of Construction Disputes complement the delay claims, as they often intersect with issues of unfinished projects. Buyers in these cases expressed dissatisfaction not only with the delay in moving into their new homes but also with the incomplete state of the construction, which could lead to additional complications and costs down the line.
The builder consistently cited Unforeseen Circumstances as their defense in these cases. They attributed delays and non-completion of projects to events beyond their control, which they claimed exempted them from responsibility. However, the legal outcomes suggest that this defense did not resonate with the courts, indicating a level of disfavor towards builders who blame circumstance rather than taking responsibility for their projects.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: buyers commonly contest the builder’s timelines and project completion status. The primary trigger for litigation seems to be the builder’s inability to fulfill their contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely delivery and complete construction of flats.
The builder lost these cases likely due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of unforeseen circumstances. It’s also possible that they failed to comply with legal or regulatory requirements governing construction timelines and project completion, which would have undermined their defense further.
Overall, these findings highlight the importance for potential buyers to be vigilant when engaging with builders, ensuring they assess thoroughly the builder's track record, understand the terms of their contracts, and are aware of their legal rights in the event of delays or disputes.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -छाग -.48--0409 | Madhya Pradesh | The appellant sought compensation for delay in po… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed compen… | श्री रामबाबू रघुवंशी | Himanshu Infrastruc… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/206215106218.pdf |